|
Volumn 46, Issue 9-10, 2002, Pages 29-33
|
The experience of gas pipeline stress-strain state control with usage of the metal magnetic memory method as compared with conventional methods and stress control means
a a a b |
Author keywords
Calibration; Comparisons; Compressors; Computation; Eddy current testing; Elbows; Electromagnetic fields; Hardness; Measurement; Nondestructive testing; Oil industry; Other test methods; Pipelines; Pipework; Practical investigations; Precision; Service conditions; Strain; Strain gauges; Stress; Stress concentration; Ultrasonic testing
|
Indexed keywords
CALCULATIONS;
CALIBRATION;
COMPRESSORS;
EDDY CURRENT TESTING;
ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS;
HARDNESS;
MAGNETIC MEASURING INSTRUMENTS;
PETROLEUM INDUSTRY;
STRAIN GAGES;
STRAIN MEASUREMENT;
STRESS CONCENTRATION;
ULTRASONIC TESTING;
COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES;
FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS;
GAS COMPRESSORS;
GAS PIPELINES;
MAGNETIC DEVICES;
MAGNETIC STORAGE;
MAGNETISM;
MEASUREMENTS;
NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION;
PIPELINES;
STRAIN;
STRESSES;
AMPLITUDE-PHASE FREQUENCY CHARACTERISTICS METHOD;
ELBOWS;
HARDNESS MEASUREMENT;
METAL MAGNETIC MEMORY METHOD;
OIL INDUSTRY;
PIPEWORK;
PRECISION;
STRESS-STRAIN STATE CONTROL;
COMPARISONS;
OIL INDUSTRIES;
PIPEWORKS;
PRACTICAL INVESTIGATIONS;
SERVICE CONDITIONS;
TEST METHOD;
GAS PIPELINES;
EDDY CURRENT TESTING;
|
EID: 0036766610
PISSN: 00432288
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/BF03377346 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (3)
|