Bond-slip response of reinforcing bars grouted in ducts

ACI Structural Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 568-576

  Raynor, Dan J ^a   Lehman, Dawn E ^b   Stanton, John F ^b  

^a ABAM Engineers in Federal Way ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bond; Duct; Reinforcement

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC LOADS; DUCTS; GROUTING; PRECAST CONCRETE;

REINFORCING BARS;

REINFORCED CONCRETE;

EID: 0036766255     PISSN: 08893241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. AGI Committee 318, 1999, "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACT 318-99) and Commentary (318R-99)," American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 391 pp.
2. Bautech, 2000, website: www.bautech.com.
3. Check, G. S.; Stone, W. C.; and Nakaki, S. D., 1996, "Simplified Design Procedure for Hybrid Precast Concrete Connections," Report No. NISTIR 5765, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, NIST, Gaithersburg, Md., Feb., 82 pp.
4. Dayton/Richmond, 1999, Concrete Accessories: Products for Concrete Construction, Miamisburg, Ohio, 4 pp.
5. Eligehausen, R.; Bertero V. V.; and Popov E. P., 1983, "Local Bond Stress-Slip Relationships of Deformed Bars under Generalized Excitations," Report No. EERC 83/23, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 178 pp.
6. Goto, Y., 1971, "Cracks Formed in Concrete around Deformed Tensioned Bars," ACI JOURNAL, Proceedings V. 68, No. 4, Apr., pp. 244-251.
7. Hassan, F. M., and Hawkins, N. M., 1977, "Anchorage of Reinforcing Bars for Seismic Forces," Reinforced Concrete Structures in Seismic Zones, SP-53, N. M. Hawkins, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., pp. 387-416.
8. New Zealand Concrete Society, 1999, Guidelines for the Use of Structural Precast Concrete in Buildings, 2nd Edition, Appendix B, Centre for Advanced Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 144 pp.
9. NMB, 2000, engineering data sheets, Splice Sleeve North America, Inc., Sacramento, Calif, 2 pp.
10. Priestley, M. J. N.; Seible, F.; and Calvi, G. M., 1996, Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, Wiley Interscience, 686 pp.
11. Priestley, M. J. N.; Sritharan, S.; Conley, J. R.; and Pampanin, S., 1999, "Preliminary Results from the PRESSS Five-Story Test Building," PCI Journal, V, 41, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., pp. 42-67.
12. Raynor, D. J., 2000, "Bond Assessment of Hybrid Frame Continuity Reinforcement," MSCE thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., 248 pp.
13. Stanton, J. F., and Nakaki, S. D., 2001, "Design Guidelines for Precast Concrete Structural Seismic Systems," Structures and Mechanics Report No. SM 02-20, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, 108 pp.
14. Stanton, J. F.; Stone, W. C.; and Cheok, G. S., 1997, "A Hybrid Reinforced Precast Frame for All Seismic Regions," PCI Journal, V. 42, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 20-32.
15. Stone, W. C.; Cheok, G. S.; and Stanton, J. F., 1995, "Performance of Hybrid Moment Resisting Precast Beam-Column Concrete Connections Subjected to Seismic Loading," ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 2, Mar.Apr., pp. 229-249.