Expression of the narrow leaflet gene for yield and agronomic traits in soybean

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 346-351

  Dinkins, R D ^b   Keim, K R ^a   Farno, L ^a   Edwards, L H ^a,c  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c Emeritus ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMIC TRAIT; ALLELE; ARTICLE; BACKCROSSING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVAR; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE LOCUS; HETEROSIS; HETEROZYGOSITY; HYBRID; INHERITANCE; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT HEIGHT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT YIELD; POD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEED MORPHOLOGY; SEED WEIGHT; SOYBEAN;

CROSSES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION; GENES, PLANT; PLANT LEAVES; SOYBEANS;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 0036766219     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/93.5.346     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bernard RL and Weiss MG, 1973. Qualitative genetics. In: Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses (Caldwell BE, ed). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy; 117-154.
2. Brim CA and Cockerham CC, 1961. Inheritance of quantitative characters in soybeans. Crop Sci 1:187-190.
3. Cerna FJ. Cianzio SR, Rafalski A, Tingey S, and Dyer D, 1997. Relationship between seed yield heterosis and molecular marker heterozygosity in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 95:460-467.
4. Domingo WE, 1945. Inheritance of number of seeds per pod and leaflet shape in the soybean. J Agric Res 70:251-268.
5. 1 hybrids between near-isogenic Rht dwarf and tall wheats. J Agric Sci (Camb) 129:371-378.
6. Gadag RN and Upadhyaya HD, 1995. Heterosis in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Indian J Genet 55:308-314.
7. Garber RJ and Rowley HK, 1927. A defective endosperm in the heterozygous condition as related to yield in maize. J Am Soc Agron 19:797-803.
8. 2 populations of southern founding stock using genetic similarity measures. Crop Sci 33:620-626.
9. Gustafsson Å, 1946. The effect of heterozygosity on variability and vigour. Hereditas 32:263-286.
10. Hartwig EE and Edwards CJ, 1970. Effect of morphological characteristics upon seed yield in soybean. Agron J 62:64-65.
11. 1 among varietal crosses [in Chinese]. Soybean Sci 12:190-196.
12. Jain KC and Singh BB, 1978. Effect of leaf type, pubescence type and non-nodulating genes on yield and quality characters in soybean. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 38:67-70.
13. Johnson HW and Bernard RL, 1962. Soybean genetics and breeding. Adv Agron 14:149-221.
14. Jones DF, 1945. Heterosis resulting from degenerative changes. Genetics 30:527-542.
15. Jordaan JP, Engelbrecht SA, Malan JH, and Knobel HA, 1999. Wheat and heterosis. In: Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops (Coors JG and Pandey S, eds). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy; 411-421.
16. Karper RE, 1930. The effect of a single gene upon development in the heterozygote in sorghum. J Hered 21:187-192.
17. Kenworthy WJ and Schillinger JA, 1980. Registration of Miles soybean. Crop Sci 20:287-288.
18. Kunta T, Edwards LH, and Keim KR, 1997. Heterosis, inbreeding depression, and combining ability in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. SABRAO J Breed Genet 29:21-32.
19. 1 hybrid soybean. Crop Sci 38:1137-1142.
20. Ma R, Gai J, and Hu Y, 1983. A study on genetic variability of successive generations after hybridization in soybean. I. Heterosis and inbreeding depression [in Chinese]. Sci Agric Sin 5:1-6.
21. Mandl FA and Buss GR, 1981. Comparison of narrow and broad leaflet isolines of soybean. Crop Sci 21:25-27.
22. Mangelsdorf PC, 1928. The effects of a lethal on the heterozygote in maize. J Hered 19:123-131.
23. Nelson RL and Bernard RL, 1984. Production and performance of hybrid soybeans. Crop Sci 24:549-553.
24. Nickell CD, Schwenk FW, and Schapaugh WT Jr, 1982. Registration of Douglas soybean. Crop Sci 22:160.
25. Palmer RG, Gai J, Sun H, and Burton JW, 2001. Production and evaluation of hybrid soybean. Plant Breed Rev 21:263-308.
26. Quinby JR and Karper RE, 1946. Heterosis in sorghum resulting from the heterozygous condition of a single gene that affects duration of growth. Am J Bot 33:716-721.
27. Robertson DW and Austin WW, 1935. The effect of one and of two seedling lethals in the heterozygous condition on barley development. J Agric Res (Washington, DC) 51:435-440.
28. Sax K, 1923. The association of size of differences with seed-coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 8:552-560.
29. Sun H, Zhao L, Li J, and Wang S, 1999. The investigation of heterosis and pollen transfer in soybean. In: World Soybean Research Conference VI, 4-7 Aug (Kauffman HE, ed). Champaign, IL: Superior Printing; 489-490.
30. Takahashi N, 1934. Linkage relation between the genes for the form of leaves and the number of seeds per pod of soybeans. Jpn J Genet 9:208-225.
31. Virmani SS, 1999. Exploitation of heterosis for shifting the yield frontier in rice. In: Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops (Coors JG and Pandey S, eds). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy; 423-438.
32. Weiss MG, 1970. Genetic linkage in soybeans. Linkage group IV. Crop Sci 10:368-370.