Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: An Indian perspective

Indian Journal of Urology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 29-37

  Arvind, Nand Kishore ^a   Kumar, Anant ^a  

^a SANJAY GANDHI POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; CREATININE; MANNITOL; MORPHINE SULFATE; NARCOTIC AGENT; OSMOTIC DIURETIC AGENT; TRAMADOL;

ADRENAL HEMORRHAGE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMORAL NERVE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; HYDRATION; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INDIA; INTESTINE INJURY; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY VEIN THROMBOSIS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONOR; NEPHRECTOMY; NERVE COMPRESSION; NONHUMAN; OLIGURIA; OPERATION DURATION; PARESTHESIA; PNEUMONIA; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECIPIENT; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SEIZURE; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THIGH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER DISEASE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 0036766042     PISSN: 09701591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. US Renal Data System (USRDS): 1994 Annual Data Report. The National Institute of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Diabetes and Kidney Disease, Besthesda, MD, June 1994.
2. 1997 Annual Report of the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Transplant Data: 1988-1996. UNOS, Richmond, VA and the Division of Transplantation, Bureau of Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human services, Rockville, MD.
3. Gill IS, Carbone JM, Claymen RV et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 1994; 8: 143.
4. Ratner LE, Ceseck LJ, Moore RG et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1047.
5. D'Alessandro AM, Sollinger HW, Knechtle SJ et al. Living related and unrelated donors for kidney transplantation. A 28-year experience. Ann Surg 1995; 222(3): 353-364.
6. Johnson EM, Remucal MJ, Gillingham KJ et al. Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1997; 64(8): 1124-1128.
7. Dunn JF, Nylander WA, Richie RE et al. Living related kidney donors. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg 1996; 203(6): 637-643.
8. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Current role in renal allograft procurement. Urology 2000; 55(6): 807-811.
9. Wolf JS, Marcovich R, Merion RM et al. Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2000; 163(6): 1650-1653.
10. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226(4): 483-490.
11. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy - A comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997; 63(2): 229-233.
12. London E, Rudich S, McVicar J et al. Equivalent renal allograft function with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomies. Transplant Proc 1999; 31(1-2): 258-260.
13. Ayvazian M and Khauli RB. Open vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Contemp Urol 2001; 5.
14. Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1999; 67(5): 722-728.
15. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The four-year John Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14(9): 2090-2093.
16. Ratner LE, Hiller J, Sroka M et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincentives to live donation. Transplant Proc 1997; 29(8): 3402-3403.
17. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG et al. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc 1997; 29(1-2): 138-139.
18. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 2001; 164: 1494.
19. Ratner LE, Bisshoff JT, Montogmery RA et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Long-term results. J Urol Suppl 1998; 159: 182.
20. Hensman C, Lionel G, Hewett P, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The preliminary experience. Aust NZJ Surg 1999; 69(5): 365-368.
21. Hiller J, Sroka M, Holochek MJ et al. Functional advantages of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy compared with conventional open-donor nephrectomy. J Transpl Coord 1997; 7(3): 134-140.
22. Odland MD, Ney AL, Jacobs DM et al. Initial experience with laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Surg 1999; 126: 603.
23. Kumar A, Dubey D, Arvind NK et al. Laparoscopy-assistive live donor nephrectomy: A modified cost-effective approach for developing countries. J Endo 2002; 16(3): 155.
24. Finelli FC, Gongora E, Sasaki TM et al. A survey: The prevalence of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at large U.S. transplant centers. Transplantation 2001; 71: 1862.
25. McDougall EM, Monk TG, Wolf JS et al. The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 182(4): 317-328.
26. Lee BR, Cadeddu JA, Molnar-Nadasdy G et al. Chronic effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal histology. J Endourol 1999; 13(4): 279-282.
27. Novick AC. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Con Urology 1999; 53(4): 668-670.
28. Fabrio MD, Ratner LE, Montogomery RA, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 26: 247.
29. Wolf JS Jr, Tcheten MB, Merion RM. Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 1998; 52: 885.
30. Yang SC, Park DS, Lee DH et al. Retroperitoneal endoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Report of three cases. J Urol 1995; 153: 1884.
31. Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: Comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation. 1999; 68(4): 497-502.
32. Slakey DP, Wood JC, Hender D et al. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Advantages of the hand-assisted method. Transplantation 1999; 68(4): 581-583.
33. Kavoussi L, Chow G, Ratner L. Open vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Contemporary Urology 2001; 5.
34. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Chavin KD et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Technical consideration and allograft vascular length (letter to editor). Transplantation 1998; 65: 1657.
35. Kim F, Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR. Renal transplantation: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 777.
36. Scott LB, Thomas RB, Mathew CR et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with conventional approach (Editorial comment by McDougall EM). J Urol 2001; 165: 766.
37. Shaffer D, Sahyon AI, Madras PN et al. Two-hundred-one consecutive living donor nephrectomies. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 426.
38. Barry JM. Editorial comment. J Urol 2000; 164: 1499.
39. Gill IS, Uzoo RG, Hobart MG et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purpose of allotransplantation and autotransplantation. J Urol 2000; 164: 1500.
40. Lee RB, Chow GK, Ratner LE et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Outcomes equivalent to open surgery. J Endourol 2000; 14: 811.
41. Turk IA, Sedar D, Davis JW et al. Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: A new technique with preservation of vascular length. J Urol 2002; 167: 630.
42. Buell JF, Edye M,Johnson M et al. Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? Ann Surg 2001; 233: 645.
43. Kumar A, Arvind NK. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. In: AK Hemal. Contemporary Trends in Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery. B I Churchill Livingstone. 2002; 229-239.
44. Soin AS, Rajasekar MR, Rajakumari V et al. Experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in India: Is the open approach justified any longer? Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 1585.