Dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty with antegrade placement of ureteral stent: Simplification of the technique

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 439-445

  Rodrigues, Henrique ^a   Rodrigues, Paulo ^a   Ruela, Marcos ^a   Bernabé, Antônio ^a   Buogo, Gilberto ^a  

^a Instituto Albarran de Urologia   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Kidney; Laparoscopy; Ureter; Ureteral obstruction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PYELOPLASTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER STENT; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 0036765350     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Nadler RB, Rao GS, Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Clayman RV: Acucise endopyelotomy: assessment of long-term durability. J Urol. 1996; 156: 1094-7.
2. Scardino PT, Scardino PL: Obstruction of the Ureteropelvic Junction. In: Bergman H (ed.), The Ureter. New York, Springer-Verlag; 1981, p. 697.
3. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecyanhuey LV, Preminger GM: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993; 150: 1795-8.
4. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol. 1999; 162: 692-5.
5. Jarret TW: Technique of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Braz J Urol. 2000; 26: 76-81.