Contextual influences on the pursuit of secondary goals in request messages

Communication Monographs

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 189-203

  Meyer, Janet R ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036763536     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637750216539     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baxter, L.A. (1984). An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 70, 427-456.
2. Berger, C.R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Boster, F.J., & Stiff, J.B. (1984). Compliance gaining message selection behavior. Human Communication Research, 10, 539-556.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Burgoon, J.K., & Dunbar, N.E. (2000). An interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67, 96-121.
6. Burleson, B.R., & Caplan, S.E. (1998). Cognitive complexity. In J.C. McCroskey, J.A. Daly, M.M. Martin, & M.J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 233-286). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
7. Cody, M.J., Canary, D.J., & Smith, S.W. (1994). Compliance gaining goals: An inductive analysis of actors' goal types, strategies, and successes. In J.A. Daly & J.M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 33-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cody, M.J., Greene, J.O., Marston, P.J., O'Hair, H.D., Baaske, K.T., & Schneider, M.J. (1986). Situation perception and message strategy selection. In M.L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 9 (pp. 390-420). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Cody, M.J., & McLanghlin, M.L. (1980). Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 47, 132-148.
10. Cody, M.J., Woelfel, M.L., & Jordan, W.J. (1983). Dimensions of compliance-gaining situations. Human Communication Research, 9, 99-113.
11. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
13. Dillard, J.P. (1990). The nature and substance of goals in tactical communication. In M.J. Cody & M.L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 70-90). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
14. Dillard, J.P., & Burgoon, M. (1985). Situation influences on the selection of compliance-gaining messages: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52, 289-304.
15. Dillard, J.P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J.M. (1989). Primary and relational goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56, 19-38.
16. Dillard, J.P., Solomon, D.H., & Palmer, M.T. (1999). Structuring the concept of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 49-65.
17. Hunter, J.E. (1980). Factor analysis. In P.R. Monge & J.N. Cappella (Eds.). Multivariate techniques in human communication research (pp. 229-257). New York: Academic Press.
18. Leichty, G., & Applegate, J.O. (1991). Social-cognitive and situation influences on the use of face-saving persuasive strategies. Human Communication Research, 17, 451-484.
19. Lim, T.-S., & Bowers, J.W. (1991). Face-work: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415-450.
20. Meyer, J.R. (1990). Cognitive processes underlying the retrieval of compliance-gaining strategies: An implicit rules model. In J.P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 57-73). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
21. Meyer, J.R. (1994). Effect of situation features on the likelihood of addressing face needs in requests. The Southern Communication Journal, 59, 240-254.
22. Meyer, J.R. (1996). Retrieving knowledge in social situations: A test of the implicit rules model. Communication Research, 23, 581-611.
23. Meyer, J.R. (1997). Cognitive influences on the ability to address interaction goals. In J.O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 71-90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Meyer, J.R. (2001a). Effect of request type and situation features on negative politeness in requests. Communication Research Reports, 78, 158-165.
25. Meyer, J.R. (2001b). Pursuing relational goals in requests: The effects of dispositional factors and type of relationship. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 51-65.
26. Miller, M.D. (1982). Power and relationship type as predictors of compliance-gaining strategy use. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 111-121.
27. Miller, G.R., Boster, F.J., Roloff, M.E., & Seibold, D. (1977). Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
28. Miller, G.R., Boster, F.J., Roloff, M.E., & Seibold, D. (1987). MBRS rekindled: Some thoughts on compliance gaining in interpersonal settings. In M.E. Roloff & G.R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 89-117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Norton, R.W. (1983). Communicator style. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Roloff, M.E., & Janiszewski, C.A. (1989). Overcoming obstacles to interpersonal compliance: A principle of message construction. Human Communication Research, 16, 33-61.
31. Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 85-128). NY: Academic Press.
32. Tracy, K., Craig, R.T., Smith, M., & Spisak, F. (1984). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a compliance-gaining approach. Human Communication Research, 10, 513-538.
33. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J.H., & Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W.W. Norton.
34. Wilson, S.R. (1990). Development and test of a cognitive rules model of interaction goals. Communication Monographs, 57, 81-103.
35. Wilson, S.R. (1995). Elaborating the cognitive rules model of interaction goals: The problem of accounting for individual differences in goal formation. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 18 (pp. 3-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Wilson, S.R., Aleman, C.G., & Leatham, G.B. (1998). Identity implications of influence goals: A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25, 64-96.