Juvenile corrections and continuity of care in a community context - The evidence and promising directions

Federal Probation

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 72-77

  Altschuler, David M ^a   Armstrong, Troy L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036763480     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Altschuler, D.M. (1984). Community reintegration in juvenile offender programming. In R. Mathias, P. DeMuro & R. Allinson (Eds.), Violent juvenile offenders: An anthology (pp. 365-376). San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
2. Altschuler, D.M. (1994). Tough and smart juvenile incarceration: reintegrating punishment, deterrence and rehabilitation. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 14, 217-237.
3. Altschuler, D.M. & Armstrong, T.L. (1994). Intensive aftercare for high-risk juveniles: A community care model. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
4. Altschuler, D.M. & Armstrong, T.L. (1995). Managing aftercare services for delinquents. In B. Glick and A.P. Goldstein (Eds.), Managing delinquency programs that work. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
5. Altschuler, D.M. & Armstrong, T.L. (1997). Reintegrating high-risk juvenile offenders from secure correctional facilities into the community. Corrections Management Quarterly, 1, 75-83.
6. Altschuler, D.M., & Armstrong, T.L. (1999). Reintegrative confinement and intensive aftercare. In D.M. Altschuler, T.L. Armstrong, & D.L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Juvenile justice bulletin: Reintegration, supervised release, and intensive aftercare. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
7. Altschuler, D.M. & Armstrong, T.L. (2001). Reintegrating high-risk juvenile offenders into communities: Experiences and prospects. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 72-88.
8. Altschuler, D.M., Armstrong, T.L., & MacKenzie, D.L. (1999). Reintegration, supervised release, and intensive aftercare. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
9. Andrews, D.A. (1978). Implications of classification for treatment of juveniles. Paper presented at American Probation and Parole Association Meeting in Salt Lake City.
10. Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
11. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
12. Baird, S.C. (1983), Report on intensive supervision programs in probation and parole. Washington, D.C: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
13. Banks, J., Porter, A.L., Rardin, R.L., Silver, T.R., & Unger, V.E. (1977). Phase I evaluation of intensive special probation projects. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
14. Barton, C., Alexander, J.F., Waldron, M., Turner, C.W. & Warburton, J. (1985). Generalizing treatment effects of functional family therapy: Three replications. American Journal of Family Therapy, 13(3), 16-26.
15. Bean, J.S. (1988). The effect of individualized reality therapy on the recidivism rates and locus of control orientation of male juvenile offenders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Mississippi, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts international, 49(06), 2370B. (University Microfilms No. 88-18138).
16. Beck, A.J., & Shipley, B.E. (1987). Recidivism of young parolees. Criminal Justice Archive Information Network.
17. Borduin, C.M., Henggeler, S.W., Blaske, D.M., & Stein, R.J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 34, 105-113.
18. Byrne, J.M., & Kelly, L. (1989). Restructuring probation as an intermediate sanction: An evaluation of the Massachusetts intensive probation supervision program. Unpublished final report to U.S. National Institute of Justice.
19. Byrne, J.M., Lurigio, A.J., & Baird, S.C. (1989). The effectiveness of the new intensive supervision programs (Research in Corrections, No. 5). Washington, D.C.: U.S. National Institute of Corrections.
20. Byrne, J.M., & Pattavina, A. (1992). The effectiveness issue: Assessing what works in the adult community corrections system. In J.M. Byrne, A.J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 281-303). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Catalano, R.F., Wells, E.A., Jenson, J.M., & Hawkins, J.D. (1989). Aftercare services for drug-using adjudicated youth in residential settings. Social Service Review, 63, 553-577.
22. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1998). Continuity of offender treatment for substance use disorders from institution to community. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, (#30). Washington, DC: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
23. Chandler, M.J. (1973). Egocentrism and antisocial behavior: The assessment and training of social perspective-taking skills. Developmental Psychology, 9, 326-333.
24. Clear, T. (March 1988). Statistical prediction in corrections. Research in corrections. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
25. Cohen, J., & Canela-Cacho, J.A. (1994). Incarceration and violent crime: 1965-1988. In A.J. Reiss Jr. & J.A. Roth (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence, volume 4, consequences and controls. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: Reconsidering the "Nothing Works" debate. In L. Goodstein and D. MacKenzie (Eds.), The American prison: Issues in research and policy. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
27. Delinquency Research Group. (1986). An evaluation of the delinquency of participants in the Youth at Risk program. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate School, Center for Applied Social Research.
28. Erwin, B.S. & Bennett, L. (1987). New dimensions in probation: Georgia's experience with intensive probation supervision. Research in brief. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
29. Frederick, B. (1999). Factors contributing to recidivism among youth placed with the New York State Division For Youth. Research Report. Albany, NY: Office of Justice Systems Analysis, New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services.
30. Glick, B., & Goldstein, A.P. (1987). Aggression replacement training. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, 356-362.
31. Gordon, D.A., Graves, K., & Arbuthnot, J. (1987). Prevention of adult criminal behavior using family therapy for disadvantaged juvenile delinquents. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, Athens, OH.
32. Guerra, N.G. & Slaby, R.G. (1990). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 2. Intervention. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 269-277.
33. Hagan, J. (1991). Destiny and drift: Subcultural preferences, status attainments and the risks and awards of youth. American Sociological Review, 56, 567-582.
34. Hawkins, J.D., Herrenkohl, T., Farrington, D.P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R.r., & Harachi, T.W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D.P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 106-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..
35. Jesness, C.F., Allison, F.S., McCormic, P.M., Wedge, R.F., & Young, M.L. (1975). Evaluation of the effectiveness of contingency contracting with delinquents. Sacramento, CA: California Youth Authority.
36. Kantrowitz, R.E. (1980). Training nonprofessionals to work with delinquents: Differential Impacts of varying training/supervisions/ intervention strategies (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40(10), 5007B. (University Microfilms No. 80-06139).
37. Kawaguchi, R.M. (1975). Camp Fenner Canyon evaluation: Final report. Los Angeles County Probation Department (NCJRS Document Reproduction Service No. NCJ036121).
38. Kemp, M., & Lee, R. (1975). Project Crest: A third year experimental study. Gainesville, FL: Project Crest.
39. Kirigin, K.A., Braukmann, C.J., Atwater, J.D., & Worl, M.M. (1882). An evaluation of teaching family (achievement place) group homes for juvenile offenders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15(1), 1-16.
40. Krisberg, B., Rodriguez, O., Bakke, A., Neuenfeldt, D., & Steele, P. (1989). Demonstration of post-adjudication non-residential intensive supervision programs: Assessment report. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
41. Lee, R., & Haynes, N.M. (1978). Counseling delinquents: Dual treatment revisited. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 22, 130-133.
42. Lee, R., & Haynes, N.M. (1978a). Counseling juvenile offenders: An experimental evaluation of Project Crest. Community Mental Health Journal, 14(4), 267-271.
43. Lee, R., & Olejnik, S. (1981). Professional outreach counseling can help the juvenile probationer: A two-year follow-up study. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 59, 445-449.
44. Lipsey, M. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T.D. Cook, H. Cooper, D.S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L.V. Hedges, R.J. Light, T.A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
45. Lipsey, M.W. & Derzon, J.H. (1998). Predictors of violence or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D.P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..
46. Lipsey, M.W. & Wilson, D.B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D.P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..
47. Lurigio, A.J., & Petersilia, J. (1992). The emergence of intensive probation supervision programs in the United States. In J.M. Byrne, A.J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 3-17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
48. MacKenzie, D.L. (1997). Criminal justice and crime prevention. In L.W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D.L. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Bushway. Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Report to the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
49. MacKenzie, D.L. (1999). Commentary: The effectiveness of aftercare programs-Examining the evidence. In D.M. Altschuler, T.L. Armstrong, & D.L. MacKenzie, (Eds.) Juvenile justice bulletin: Reintegration, supervised release, and intensive aftercare. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
50. Markley, G. & Eisenberg, M. (1986). The Texas Board of Pardons and Parole case management system. Austin, TX: Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.
51. Moore, C.B. (1978). Ego strength and behavior: A study of a residential treatment program for delinquent girls (Doctoral dissertation, The California School of Professional Psychology, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38(10), 5033B. (University Microfilms No. 78-02837).
52. Moore, R.H. (1987). Effectiveness of citizen volunteers functioning as counselors for high-risk young male offenders. Psychological Reports, 61, 823-830.
53. Moore, R.H., & Levine, D. (1974). Evaluation research of a community-based probation program. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Department of Psychology.
54. National Research Council. (1993). Losing generations: Adolescents in high risk settings. Panel on High Risk Youth, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
55. National Research Council. (2001). Juvenile crime, juvenile justice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56. Neithercutt, M.G., & Gottfredson, D.M. (1973). Caseload size variation and difference in probation/parole performance. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
57. Petersilia, J. (1987). Expanding options for criminal sentencing. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
58. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Comparing intensive and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: Early results from an experiment in California. Crime & Delinquency, 36(1), 87-111.
59. Petersilia, J. & Turner, S. (1991). An evaluation of intensive probation in California. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(3), 610-658.
60. Petersilia, J., Turner, S., & Deschenes, E.P. (1992). The costs and effects of intensive supervision for drug offenders. Federal Probation, 56(4), 12-17.
61. Piercy, F., & Lee, R. (1976). Effects of a dual treatment approach on the rehabilitation of habitual juvenile delinquents. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 19, 482-492.
62. Schlicter, K.J., & Horan, J.J. (1981). Effects of stress inoculation on the anger and aggression management skills of institutionalized juvenile delinquents. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5(4), 359-365.
63. Schwitzgebel, R., & Kolb, D.A. (1964). Inducing behaviour change in adolescent delinquents. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1, 297-304.
64. Seckel, J.P., & Turner, J.K. (1985). Assessment of Planned Re-entry Programs (PREP). Sacramento, CA: California Youth Authority.
65. Shannon, L.W., McKim, J.L., Curry, J.P., & Haffner, L.J. (1988). Criminal career continuity: Its Social Context. New York, NY: Human Sciences Press, Inc..
66. Sherman, L.W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D.L., Eck., J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Report to the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
67. Shivrattan, J.L. (1988). Social interactional training and incarcerated juvenile delinquents. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 30, 145-163.
68. Spence, S.H., & Marzillier, J.S. (1981). Social skills training with adolescent male offenders-II: Short-term, long-term and generalized effects. Behavior Research & Therapy, 19, 349-368.
69. Thambidurai, G.A. (1980). A comparative outcome study of a contract parole program for individuals committed to the youth correctional complex in the state of New Jersey (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(01), 371B. (University Microfilms No. 80-16503).
70. Travis, J. & Petersilia, J. (2001). Reentry reconsidered: A new look at an old question. Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 291-313.
71. Turner, S. & Petersilia, J. (1992). Focusing on high-risk parolees: An experiment to reduce commitments to the Texas Department of Corrections. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29(1), 34-61.
72. Wiebush, R.G., McNulty, B., & Le, T. (2000). Implementation of the intensive community-based aftercare program. Juvenile justice bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
73. Wolf, M.M., Phillips, E.L., & Fixson, D.L. (1974). Achievement place: Phase II (Vol. I). Rockville, MD: Center for Studies of Crime and Delinquency, National Institute of Mental Health.