An empirical investigation of the adoption of egovernment in Australian citizens: Some unexpected research findings

Journal of Computer Information Systems

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 15-22

  Huang, Wayne ^a   D'Ambra, J ^a   Bhalla, V ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODELS (TAM);

CORRELATION METHODS; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MOTIVATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WEBSITES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0036758301     PISSN: 08874417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams, D.A., R.R. Nelson, and P.A. Todd. "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information," MIS Quarterly, 16:2, June 1992, pp. 227-248.
2. Adams, D.A., R.R. Nelson and P.A. Todd. "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication," MIS Quarterly, 16:2, 1992, pp. 227-247.
3. Ajzen, I. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1988.
4. Andrulis, J. "Reconstructing Government: Decisions That Will Shape Your Future," IBM Group, 2000.
5. Ba, S., J. Stallaert, and A. Whinston. "Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design - The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, 12:3, September 2001, pp. 225-239.
6. Baligh, H.H. "Components of Culture - Nature, Interconnections, and Relevance to the Decisions on the Organization Structure," Management Science, 40:1, January 1994, pp. 14-27.
7. Bohmstedt, G.W. "Reliability and Validity Assessment in Attitude Measurement." In Summers, G.F. (Ed.). Attitude Measurement. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1970, pp, 80-99.
8. Cale, E.G. "Implementing Standard Computer-based Application Programs in Multiple Site Organizations," Doctoral Thesis, Harvard Business School, 1979.
9. Cronbach, L.J. "Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests," Psychometrica, 16, 1951, pp, 297-334.
10. D'Ambra, J., and E.R. Rice. "Emerging Factors in User Valuation of the World Wide Web," Information and Management, 38, 2001, pp. 373-384.
11. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R, Warshaw. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, 35:8, 1989, pp. 982-1003.
12. th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1995.
13. Fishbein, M., I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Research and Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
14. Government Online, The Commonwealth Government's Strategy, April 2000.
15. Hendrickson, A.R., K. Glorfeld, and T.P. Cronan. "On the Repeated Test-retest Reliability of the End-user Computing Satisfaction Instrument: A Comment," Decision Sciences, 25:4, 1994, pp. 655-667.
16. Hofstede, G. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1980.
17. Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw Hill, 1991.
18. Huang, W. and K.K. Wei. "An Empirical Investigation of Effects of GSS and Task Type on Social Interactions from an Influence Perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems, 17:2, Fall 2000, pp. 181-206.
19. IBM 2000. "eGovernment: Making it Work," White Paper.
20. Keil, M., P,M. Beranek, and B.R, Konsynski. "Usefulness and Ease of Use: Field Study Evidence Regarding Task Considerations," Decision Support Systems, 13:1, 1995, pp. 75-91.
21. Lederer, A.L., D.J. Maupin, M.P. Sena, and Y. Zhuang. "The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web," Decision Support Systems, 29, 2000.
22. Maher, P.N. and A.H. Rubenstein. "Factors Affecting Adoption of a Quantitative Method for R and D Project Selection," Management Science, 21:2, 1974.
23. Mathieson, K. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, 23, 1991, pp. 173-191.
24. Morris, G.M. and D. Andrew. "How User Perceptions Influence Software Use," IEEE Software, July/August 1997.
25. Mosely, V. "How to Assess Tools Efficiently and Quantitatively," IEEE Software, 9:3, 1992, pp. 29-32.
26. Nunnally, J. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
27. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free, 1983.
28. Rogers, E.M. and F.F. Shoemaker. Communication of Innovations: A Cross-cultural Approach. New York: Free, 1971.
29. Schein, E.H. "On Dialogue, Culture, and Organizational Learning," Organizational Dynamics, Autumn 1993, pp. 40-51.
30. Tesser, A. and D.R. Shaffer. "Attitudes and Attitude Change," Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1990, pp. 479-523.
31. Tornatzhy, L.G. and K.J. Klein. "Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption - Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings," IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 29:1, 1982.
32. Triandis, H.C. "Values, Attitudes and Interpersonal Behavior." In Page, M.M. (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980, pp. 195-259.
33. st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'98), IEEE Computer Society, 1998.