A social learning theory comparison of the sexual victimization of adolescent sexual offenders and nonsexual offending male delinquents

Child Abuse and Neglect

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 893-907

  Burton, David L ^a   Miller, Diane Lynn ^a   Shill, Chien Tai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Female offenders; Intergenerational transmission; Sexual abuse

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD PSYCHIATRY; CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH CENTER; PREDICTION; SEXUAL CRIME; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL LEARNING; THEORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE, SEXUAL; CRIME VICTIMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MICHIGAN; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0036756469     PISSN: 01452134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00360-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Burton, D., & Fleming, W. (1998). The trauma project initial results report. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Burton, D., & Fleming, W. (2000, October). "[I felt] ashamed, dirty, used, hurt, confused, excited, and cared for": Feelings of adolescent sexual offenders and delinquents about their own victimization and perpetration. Paper presented at the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC.
4. Burton D., Nesmith A., Badten L. Clinician's views of sexually aggressive children: A theoretical exploration. Child Abuse & Neglect. 21:1997;157-170.
5. Burton, D., & Smith-Darden, J. (2001). The 2000 safer society survey report. Rutland, VA: Safer Society Press.
6. Cooper C.L., Murphy W.D., Haynes M.R. Characteristics of abused and nonabused adolescent sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 8:1996);105-119.
7. Faller K.C. The role relationship between victim and perpetrator as a predictor of characteristics of intrafamilial sexual abuse. Child and Adolescent Social Work. 6:1989;217-229.
8. Faller K.C. Polyincestuous families: An exploratory study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 6:1991;310-322.
9. Garland, R., & Dougher, M. (1990). The abused/abuser hypothesis of child sexual abuse: A critical review of theory and research. In J. Fierman (Ed.), Pedophilia: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 488-509). New York: Springer.
10. Hanson R., Slater S. Sexual victimization in the history of child sexual abusers: A review. Annals of Sex Research. 1:1988;485-499.
11. Hunter J., Figueredo A. The influence of personality and history of sexual victimization in the prediction of juvenile perpetrated child molestation. Behavior Modification. 24(2):2000;241-263.
12. Kaufman K., Hilliker D., Daleiden E. Subgroup differences in the modus operandi of adolescent sexual offenders. Child Maltreatment. 1:1996;17-24.
13. Kroner D.G., Weekes J.R. Balanced inventory of desirable responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity with an offender sample. Personality & Individual Differences. 21:1996;323-333.
14. Leguizamo, A. (2000). Differences in object relations between sexual offenders and sexual offending delinquents. Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
15. Ryan G. Victim to victimizer: Rethinking victim treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 4:1989;325-341.
16. Ryan G., Miyoshi T., Metzner J., Krugman R., Fryer G. Trends in a national sample of sexually abusive youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 35(1):1996;17-25.
17. Ryan, S., Rodriguez, J., Anderson, R., & Foy, D. (1992). Psychometric analysis of the sexual abuse exposure questionnaire (SAEQ). Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
18. Selvin, S. (1991). Statistical Analysis of Epidemiologic Data. NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Skuse, D., Bentovim, A., Hodges, J., Stevenson, J., Andreou, C., Lanyado, M., New, M., Williams, B., & Macmillan, D. (1998). Risk factors for development of sexually abusive behavior in sexually victimised adolescent boys: Cross sectional study. British Medical Journal (International ed.), 317(7152), 175-180.
20. Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
21. United States General Accounting Office. (1996). Cycle of sexual abuse (GAO/GGD-96-178). Washington, DC: United State Government Printing Office.
22. Watkins B., Bentovim A. The sexual abuse of male children and adolescents: A review of current research. Journal of Child Psychology an Psychiatry. 33:1992;197-248.
23. Widom C. Does violence beget violence? A critical examination of the literature. Psychological Bulletin. 106:1989;3-28.
24. Worling J.R. Sexual abuse histories of adolescent male sex offenders: Differences on the basis of the age and gender of their victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 104:1995;610-613.