Comparison of graft function in heterotopic and orthotopic liver transplant recipients using hepatobiliary scintigraphy

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 2156-2158

  Gencoglu, E A ^a   Karakayali, H ^a   Moray, G ^a   Haberal, M ^a  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE GRAFT REJECTION; ADULT; CADAVER DONOR; CHOLESTASIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXTRACTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEPATOBILIARY SCINTISCANNING; HEPATOCYTE EXTRACTION FRACTION; HETEROTOPIC TRANSPLANTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER CELL; LIVER FUNCTION; LIVER GRAFT; LIVER INJURY; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; IMINO ACIDS; LIVER; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; ORGANOTECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036756281     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0041-1345(02)02888-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Metselaar H.J., Hesselink E.J., de Rave S., et al. Transplantation Proc. 23:1991;1531.
2. Pirat A., Erol E., Ogus E., et al. Transplantation Proc. 32:2000;591.
3. Willemse P.J.A., Ausema L., Terpstra O.T., et al. Hepatology. 15:1992;54.
4. Tolia V., Kottamasu S.R., Tabassum D., et al. Clin Nucl Med. 24:1999;655.
5. Haberal M., Arda I.S., Karakayali H., et al. J Pediatr Surg. 36:2001;667.
6. Houssin D., Franco D., Berthelot P., et al. Lancet. 10:1980;990.