A note on design-based versus model-based variance estimation in stereology

Advances in Applied Probability

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 484-490

  Hobolth, Asger ^a   Jensen, Eva B Vedel ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Circulant matrix; Covariogram; Fourier series; Planar objects; Shape; Stationarity; Stereology; Systematic sampling

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; POLYNOMIALS; RANDOM PROCESSES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

STEREOLOGY; VARIANCE ESTIMATION;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY;

EID: 0036756138     PISSN: 00018678     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1239/aap/1033662161     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Abramovitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.
2. Diggle, P.J., Tawn, J.A. and Moyeed, R.A. (1998). Model-based geostatistics (with discussion). Appl. Statist. 47, 299-350.
3. Gual-Arnau, X. and Cruz-Orive, L.M. (2000). Systematic sampling on the circle and on the sphere. Adv. Appl. Prob. 32, 628-647.
4. Hobolth, A., Kent, J.T. and Dryden, I.L. (2002). On the relation between edge and vertex modelling in shape analysis. To appear in Scand. J. Statist.
5. Hobolth, A., Pedersen, J. and Jensen, E.B.V. (2002). A continuous parametric shape model. To appear in Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.
6. Stein, M.L. (1999). Interpolation of Spatial Data. Springer, New York.
7. Wahba, G. (1990). Spline Models for Observational Data (CBMS-NSF Regional Conf. Set. Appl. Math. 59). SIAM, Philadelpia, PA.
8. Wei, W.W.S. (1990). Time Series Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.