Determination of pairing symmetry from magnetotunneling spectroscopy: A case study for quasi-one-dimensional organic superconductors

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 945071-945076

  Tanuma, Y ^a   Kuroki, K ^b   Tanaka, Y ^c   Arita, R ^d   Kashiwaya, S ^e   Aoki, H ^d  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

^c NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MAGNETOTUNNELING SPECTROSCOPY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0036752488     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.094507     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. L.J. Buchholtz and G. Zwicknagl, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5788 (1981).
2. C.R. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1526 (1994).
3. Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451 (1995); S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1641 (2000); T. Löfwander, V.S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 14, R53 (2001).
4. Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451 (1995); S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1641 (2000); T. Löfwander, V.S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 14, R53 (2001).
5. Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451 (1995); S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1641 (2000); T. Löfwander, V.S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 14, R53 (2001).
6. M. Fogelström, D. Rainer, and J.A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 281 (1997).
7. C. Honerkamp and M. Sigrist, J. Low Temp. Phys. 111, 895 (1998).
8. M. Yamashiro, Y. Tanaka, and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7847 (1997); M. Yamashiro, Y. Tanaka, Y. Tanuma, and S. Kashiwaya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 3224 (1998).
9. M. Yamashiro, Y. Tanaka, and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7847 (1997); M. Yamashiro, Y. Tanaka, Y. Tanuma, and S. Kashiwaya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 3224 (1998).
10. J. Geerk, X.X. Xi, and G. Linker, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 73, 329 (1988).
11. M. Covington, M. Aprili, E. Paraoanu, L.H. Greene, F. Xu, J. Zhu, and C.A. Mirkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 277 (1997).
12. J.Y.T. Wei, N-C. Yeh, D.F. Garrigus, and M. Strasik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2542 (1998).
13. L. Alff, H. Takashima, S. Kashiwaya, N. Terada, H. Ihara, Y. Tanaka, M. Koyanagi, and K. Kajimura, Phys. Rev. B 55, R14 757 (1997).
14. F. Laube, G. Goll, H.v. Löhneysen, M. Fogelström, and F. Lichtenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1595 (2000).
15. Z.Q. Mao, K.D. Nelson, R. Jin, Y. Liu, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037003 (2001).
16. Ch. Wälti, H.R. Ott, Z. Fisk, and J.L. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5616 (2000).
17. 4 has recently been performed by T. Arai et al., Synth. Met. (to be published).
18. D. Jérome, A. Mazaud, M. Ribault, and K. Bechgaard, J. Phys. (France) Lett. 41, L92 (1980).
19. K. Bechgaard, K. Carneiro, M. Olsen, F.B, Rasmussen, and C.S. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 852 (1981).
20. I.J. Lee, M.J. Naughton, G.M. Danner, and P.M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3555 (1997); I.J. Lee, P.M. Chaikin, and M.J. Naughton, Phys. Rev. B 62, R14 669 (2000).
21. I.J. Lee, M.J. Naughton, G.M. Danner, and P.M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3555 (1997); I.J. Lee, P.M. Chaikin, and M.J. Naughton, Phys. Rev. B 62, R14 669 (2000).
22. I.J. Lee, S.E. Brown, W.G. Clark, M.J. Strouse, M.J. Naughton, W. Kang, and P.M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev, Lett. 88, 017004 (2002).
23. M. Takigawa, H. Yasuoka, and G. Saito, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56, 873 (1987).
24. S. Belin and K. Behnia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2125 (1997).
25. A.A. Abrikosov, J. Low Temp. Phys. 53, 359 (1983).
26. Y. Hasegawa and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56, 877 (1987).
27. A.G. Lebed, Phys. Rev. B 59, R721 (1999); A.G. Lebed, K. Machida, and M. Ozaki, ibid. 62, R795 (2000).
28. A.G. Lebed, Phys. Rev. B 59, R721 (1999); A.G. Lebed, K. Machida, and M. Ozaki, ibid. 62, R795 (2000).
29. R.L. Greene and E.M. Engler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1587 (1980).
30. V.J. Emery, Synth. Met. 13, 21 (1986).
31. M.T. Béal-Monod, C. Bourbonnais, and V.J. Emery, Phys. Rev. B 34, 7716 (1986).
32. H. Shimahara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 1735 (1989).
33. K. Kuroki and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 60, 3060 (1999).
34. H. Kino and H. Kontani, J. Low Temp. Phys. 117, 317 (1999).
35. K. Kuroki, R. Arita, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 63, 094509 (2001).
36. K. Sengupta, I. Žutić, H.-J. Kwon, V.M. Yakovenko, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 63, 144531 (2001).
37. Y. Tanuma, K. Kuroki, Y. Tanaka, and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. B 64, 214510 (2001).
38. We use the term ZEP for the peak in the surface density of states to distinguish it from the conductance peak (ZBCP).
39. 2X has been examined for various pairing symmetries in R.D. Ducan, R.W. Cerng, and A.R. Sa de Melo, cond-mat/0203570 (unpublished).
40. M. Aprili, E. Badica, and L.H. Greene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4630 (1999).
41. R. Krupke and G. Deutscher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4634 (1999).
42. L. Ducasse, M. Abderrabba, J. Hoarau, M. Pesquer, B. Gallois, and J. Gaultier, J. Phys. C 19, 3805 (1986).
43. P.M. Grant, J. Phys. (France) 44, C3-847 (1983).
44. K. Yamaji, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 55, 860 (1986).
45. L.P. Le, A. Keren, G.M. Luke, B.J. Sternlieb, W.D. Wu, Y.J. Uemura, J.H. Brewer, T.M. Riseman, R.V. Upasani, L.Y. Chiang, W. Kang, P.M. Chaikin, T. Csiba, and G. Grüner, Phys, Rev. B 48, 7284 (1993).
46. H. Yoshino, A. Oda, T. Sasaki, T. Hanajiri, J. Yamada, S, Nakatsuji, H. Anzai, and K. Murata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 3142 (1999).
47. M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 239 (1991).
48. Y. Tanaka, H. Tsuchiura, Y. Tanuma, and S, Kashiwaya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 271 (2002).
49. Y. Tanaka, T. Hirai, K. Kusakabe, and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. B 60, 6308 (1999).
50. Y. Tanaka, H. Itoh, H. Tsuchiura, Y. Tanuma, and Y. Tanaka, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 2005 (2002)
51. a in the present model. We can hence say that we have effectively taken into account the effect of both t′ and the triclinic structure by taking this parameter value.
52. a in the presence of magnetic field, where the symmetry mixing is negligible.