Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the Coalition Campus Schools Project

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 639-673

  Darling Hammond, Linda ^a   Ancess, Jacqueline ^b   Ort, Susanna Wichterle ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational evaluation; School organization; School reform; School restructuring; Small schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036745684     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00028312039003639     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Ancess, J. (1995). An inquiry high school: Learner-centered accountability at the Urban Academy. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.
2. Ancess, J., & Ort, S. (1999). The Coalition Campus Schools Project. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.
3. Bensman, D. (1987). Quality education in the inner city: The story of the Central Park East Schools. New York: Report to the New York Community Trust.
4. Bensman, D. (1995). Learning to think well: Graduates of Central Park East Secondary School. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.
5. Bensman, D. (2000). Central Park East and its graduates: Learning by Heart. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Braddock, J.H., & McPartland, J.M. (1993). The education of early adolescents. Review of Research in Education, 19, 135-170.
7. Center for Collaborative Education (1993). Center for Collaborative Education member schools brochure and Coalition Campus Schools Project brochure. New York: Author.
8. Corcoran, T.B. (1989). Restructuring education: A new vision at Hope Essential High School. In J.M. Rosow & R. Zahger (Eds.), Allies in educational reform (pp. 243-274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J.A., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J. A., McGregor, K., & Zuckerman, D. (2000). Inching toward reform in New York City: The Coalition Campus Schools Project. In Evans Clinchy (Ed.), Creating new schools: How small schools are changing American education (pp. 163-180). New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Elmore, R., & Burney, D. (1996). Staff development and instructional improvement in School District 2. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
13. Feistritzer, C.E. (1993). Report card on American education: A state-by-state analysis. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
14. Fine, M. (1994). Chartering urban school reform. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, at Teachers College, Columbia University.
15. Fouts, J. (1994). A school within a school: Evaluation results of the first year of a restructuring effort (EA 025 826). Seattle, WA: School of Education, Seattle Pacific University.
16. Fowler, W.J. (1992, April). What do we know about school size? What should we know? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
17. Garbarino, J. (1978). The human ecology of school crime: A case for small schools. In E. Wenk (Ed.), School Crime (pp. 122-133). Davis, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
18. Glaser, R. (1990). Testing and assessment: O tempora! O mores! Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
19. Gordon, R. (1992). School within a school, Grades 7, 8, 9, 10: Focus on program evaluation (UD 029 061). Des Moines, IA: Des Moines Public Schools.
20. Gottfredson, G.D., and Daiger, D.C. (1979). Disruption in 600 schools. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
21. Green, G., & Stevens, W. (1988). What research says about small schools. Rural Educators, 10(1), 9-14.
22. Haller, E.J. (1992). High school size and student indiscipline: Another aspect of the school consolidation issue? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(2), 145-156.
23. Haller, E.J. (1993). Small schools and higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9(2), 66-73.
24. Hill, P.T. (1997). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America's schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Howley, C.B. (1989). Synthesis of the effects of school and district size: What research says about achievement in small schools and school districts. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 4(1), 2-12.
26. Howley, C.B., & Huang, G. (1991). Extracurricular participation and achievement: School size as possible mediator of SES influence among individual students. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory. ERIC Document No. ED 336 247, January 1992.
27. Lee, V.E., Bryk, A.S., & Smith, J.B. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 19, 171-268.
28. Lee, V.E., & Smith, J.B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66(3), 164-187.
29. Lee, V.E., & Smith, J.B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary school students. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.
30. Lee, V.E., Smith, J.B., & Croninger, R.G. (1995, Fall). Another look at high school restructuring: More evidence that it improves student achievement and more insight into why. Issues in restructuring schools. Newsletter of the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
31. Lindsay, P. (1982). The effect of high school size on student participation, satisfaction, and attendance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(1), 57-65.
32. Lindsay, P. (1984). High school size, participation in activities, and young adult social participation: Some enduring effects of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(1), 73-83.
33. McMullan, B.J., Sipe, C.L., & Wolf, W.C. (1994). Charters and student achievement: Early evidence from school restructuring in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Center for Assessment and Policy Development.
34. Miles, K.H., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high-performing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(1), 9-29.
35. Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36. Mohrman, S.A., Lawler, E.E., & Mohrman, A.M. (1992). Applying employee involvement in schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 347-360.
37. Newmann, F.M., Marks, H.M., & Gamoran, A. (1995, April). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
38. Newmann, F.M., & Wehlage, G.G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
39. Newmann, F.M. (Ed.). (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. New York City Board of Education. (1993). Student Information Services, Report No. 24, School Year 1992-1993. New York: Author.
41. New York City Public Schools. (2000). The Class of 1996 final longitudinal report: A three-year follow-up study. New York: New York City Public Schools, Division of Assessment and Accountability.
42. Pittman, R., & Haughwout, P. (1987). Influence of high school size on dropout rate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(4), 337-343.
43. Powell, F.C., Earrar, E., and Cohen, D.K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
44. Public Education Association. (1992). Small schools' operating costs: Reversing assumptions about economies of scale. New York: Public Education Association.
45. Raywid, M.A. (1990). Successful schools of choice: Cottage industry benefits in large systems. Educational Policy, 4(2), 93-108.
46. Raywid, M.A. (1995). The Wadleigh complex: A dream that soured. In W. Boyd, R. Crowson, & H. Mawhinney (Eds.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism: Reinventing the American school. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
47. Ready, D., Lee, V.E., & LoGerfo, L.F. (2000, April). Social and academic stratification in high schools divided into schools-within-schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
48. Sizer, T. (1984). Horace's compromise The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
49. Stiefel, L., Berne, R., Iatarola, P., & Fruchter, N. (2000). High school size: Effects on budgets and performance in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 27-39.
50. Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (H.H. Gerth & C.W. Mills, Trans. and Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Wehlage, G.G., Rutter, R.A., Smith, G.A., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R.R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
52. Wehlage, G.G., Smith, G., & Lipman, P. (1992). Restructuring urban schools: The new futures experience. American Educational Research Journal 29(1), 51-93.