Stakes for students: Agenda-setting and remedial education

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 19-39

  Mazzeo, Christopher ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036744606     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2002.0027     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. www.ed.gov/pubs/Toolbox/toolbox.html.
2. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1982). Theory in practice. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
3. Bishop, J. (1996). Signaling, incentives, and school organization in France, the Netherlands, Britian, and the United States. In E. Hanushek & D. Jorgenson (Eds.), Improving American schools: The role of incentives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Bishop, J. (1998). Do curriculum-based external exit exam systems enhance student achievement? CPRE Research Report, University of Pennsylvania.
5. Blair, J. (2000, April 5). Remedial courses undergo major cutbacks. Education Week.
6. Breneman, D., & Haarlow, W. (1998). Remedial education: Costs and consequences. Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Foundation.
7. Bulkley, K. (1999). Understanding the charter school concept in legislation: The cases of Arizona, Michigan and Georgia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
8. Call it a school bill of a different sort. (1996, February 2). Tulsa World.
9. Carlin asks high schools for payback; Higher ed chief says colleges shouldn't fund remedial work. (1997, May 15). Boston Globe.
10. Gobb, R., & Elder, C. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11. College doors may open wider. (1999, November 28). Tulsa World.
12. College students face skills test. (1991, August 17). Daily Oklahoman.
13. Common education must form partnership with higher education. (1989, September 20). Tulsa World.
14. Costrell, R. (1994). A simple model of educational standards. American Economic Review, 84(4), 956-971.
15. Crowe, E. (1998). Statewide remedial education policies. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Officers.
16. Education standards not met despite progress across the state. (1999, February 11). Tulsa World.
17. Fuhrman, S., & O'Day, J. (Eds.). (1996). Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Gumport, P., & Bastedo, M. (2000). The remedial education controversy at CUNY: Perspectives on system design and endemic conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
19. Halligan to press efforts for admissions reform. (1996, July 27). Tulsa World.
20. Hanushek, E., & Jorgenson, D. (Eds). (1996). Improving America's schools: The role of incentives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Hatch, T. (1998). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 1-31.
22. Hearn, J., & Griswold, C. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 161-190.
23. Heller, D. (2001, Winter). The dark side of merit aid. National CrossTalk, 9(1).
24. High hopes for Bay State higher ed; Chancellor Stanley Koplik wants to improve quality. (1993, December 5). Boston Globe. Internet edition.
25. Higher education key to overcoming poverty. (1999, March 14.) Tulsa World. Internet edition.
26. Higher education regents OK statewide college testing plan. (1991, October 5). Daily Oklahoman.
27. Higher education; State board has good agenda, challenging task. (1996, December 19). Worcester Telegram and Gazette.
28. Hoff, D. (2000, March 22). Testing foes hope to stoke middle-class ire. Education Week.
29. Hoffman, J. (1995). Implicit theories in policy discourse. Policy Sciences, 28, 127-148.
30. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
31. Immerwahl, J. (1999). Taking responsibility: Leaders' expectations of higher education. National Center Report #99-1. San Jose, CA: Public Agenda and the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
32. Immerwahl, J. (2000, Winter). Doing comparatively well: Why the public loves higher education and criticizes K-12. National CrossTalk, 8(1).
33. Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1998). College remediation: What it is, what it costs, what's at stake. Washington, DC: IHEP.
34. Johnson, J., with A. Duffert. (1999). Standards and accountability: Where the public stands. A report from Public Agenda for the 1999 National Education Summit. New York: Public Agenda and Achieve.
35. Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: HarperCollins College.
36. Kirst, M. (1997). Strengthening the bridge between higher and secondary education: Admissions and placement policies. A proposal to the Pew Charitable Trusts.
37. Labaree, D. (1997). How to succeed in school without really learning: The credentials race in American education. New Haven, Yale University Press.
38. Learning gap, The. Pt. 1. (1996, March 17). Boston Globe. Pt. 2: States sifting strategies for remedial education. Ibid., 1996, March 18.
39. Learning gap, The. Pt. 1. (1996, March 17). Boston Globe. Pt. 2: States sifting strategies for remedial education. Ibid., 1996, March 18.
40. Levin, H., & Koski, W. (1997). Accelerating the education of remedial students in postsecondary institutions: Preliminary report and literature review regarding the extent, content, and effects of remediation in postsecondary education. Stanford, CA: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement (NCPI).
41. Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (1992, September). U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1333-1381.
42. Lindsey, D. (2000, April 5). Con-test. Education Week.
43. Malen, B., Croninger, R., Redmond, D., & Muncey, D. (1999). Uncovering the potential contradictions in reconstitution reforms: A working paper. Paper presented at the annual conference of the University Council of Educational Administration, Minneapolis, MN.
44. Massachusetts Board of Higher Education. (1997). Mindpower in Massachusetts: The commonwealth's natural resource. Boston: Author.
45. Massachusetts Board of Higher Education. (1997-2000). College-to-school report for Massachusetts high school graduates. Annual Reports. Boston, MA: Author.
46. Mass. will curb remedial study at its colleges. (1996, March 19). Boston Globe.
47. Mazzeo, C. (2000). States, educational development and examinations in nineteenth century America. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
48. McDonough, P. (1999). Doing whatever it takes: Conflict-based admissions in the post-affirmative action era. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
49. Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Schmitt, J. (2000). The state of working America, 2000-01. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
50. Muller, C., & Schiller, K. (2000, April). Leveling the playing field? Students' educational attainment and states' performance testing. Sociology of Education, 73, 196-218.
51. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Remedial education at higher education institutions in fall 1995. Washington, DC: NCES.
52. National Governors Association (NGA). (1999). States seeking to end social promotion in schools. Unpublished report, www.NGA.org.
53. National Research Council. (1999. High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. New FSC standards exceed state's; College intends to become one of most selective in public system. (1996, March 29). Wowester Telegram & Gazette.
55. Official maps future of state colleges. (1995, December 10). Boston Globe.
56. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. (2000). Annual student remediation report. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma State System of Higher Education.
57. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. (1991). Policy statement on the assessment of students for purposes of instructional improvement and state system accountability. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma State System of Higher Education.
58. Orfield, G., & Miller, E. (1998). Chilling admissions: The affirmative action crisis and the search for alternatives. The Civil Rights Project. Harvard University: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
59. OU stumbles in effort to raise bar. (1998, October 31). Tulsa World.
60. Panel adds admission standard, establishes online college. (1999, December 3). Tulsa World.
61. Panel leader stresses education reform over funding. (1989, September 9.) Daily Oklahoman.
62. Portz, J. (1996). Problem definitions and policy agendas: Shaping the educational agenda in Boston. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 371-386.
63. Powell, A. (1993). Student incentives and academic standards: Independent schools as a coherent system. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent educational policy: Improving the system (pp. 141-179). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64. Powell, A. (1996). Motivating students to learn: An American dilemma. In S. Fuhrman & J. O'Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 19-59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65. Quality counts: Rewarding results, punishing failure. (1999). An Education Week/ Pew Charitable Trust Special Report on the Condition of Education in the 50 States. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trust.
66. Quincy College puts end to remedial class credits; Courses won't count towards graduation. (1996, June 7). Patriot Ledger.
67. Reading, writing and remedial. (1998, July 13). Tulsa World.
68. Ready for college. (1998, February 12). Tulsa World.
69. Regents seek more college graduates. (1999, January 30). Tulsa World.
70. Remediation rate declines; Regents' hopeful trend continues at state schools. (1997, January 25). Tulsa World.
71. Reports urge vast higher-education reforms. (1992, November 7). Daily Oklahoman.
72. Rochefort, D., & Cobb, R. (1995). Problem definition: An emerging perspective. In D. Rochefort & R. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
73. Roderick, M., Bryk, A., & Associates. (1999). Ending social promotion: results from the first two years. Chicago: Chicago Consortium on School Reform.
74. Rodriguez, E. (1995). College admissions requirements: A new role for states. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States (ECS) and State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO).
75. Russell, A. (1998). Statewide college admissions, student preparation and remediation policies and programs. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO).
76. Schiller, K., & Muller, C. (2000, February). External examinations and accountability, educational expectations, and high school graduation. American Journal of Education, 108, 73-102.
77. Schrag, P. (1999, May-June). End of the second chance? The crusade against remedial education. American Prospect, 44, 68-74.
78. Shaw, K. (1997, Fall). Remedial education as ideological battleground: Emerging remedial education policies and their implications for community college student mobility. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
79. Shaw, K. (2000). Reframing remediation as a systemic phenomenon: A comparative analysis of remediation in two states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
80. Silber endorses payback plan; Schools defend selves on remedial work issue. (1997, May 16). Boston Globe.
81. Standards toughened in state schools; Rules change for admission, graduation. (1998, September 17). Boston Globe.
82. State education secretary urges high school graduation test. (1997, July 30). Daily Oklahoman.
83. State regents approve stricter OU admissions. (1998, October 30). Tulsa World.
84. Stone, D. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 281-300.
85. Stone, D. (1997). Policy paradox and political reason: The art of political decision making. New York: W. W. Norton.
86. Task force to nurture state's education hopes. (1989, February 28). Daily Oklahoman.
87. Weiss, C. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. Connell, A. Kubisch, L. Schorr, & C. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
88. Wells, A.S., Grutzik, C., Carnochan, C., Slayton, J., & Vasudeva, A. (1998). Underlying policy assumptions of charter school reform: The multiple meanings of a movement. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 513-535.
89. Who goes to college and who doesn't. (1996, September 1). Tulsa World.