Editorial: Back to Bismarck? The public policy implications of living longer;Éditorial: De retour à Bismarck? Les conséquences d'une plus grande longévité sur les politiques gouvernementales

Canadian Journal on Aging

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 325-336

  Myles, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; AGING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EDITORIAL; EMPLOYMENT; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH STATUS; LONGEVITY; PENSION; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RETIREMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIAL WELFARE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0036744572     PISSN: 07149808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s071498080000163x     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Barr, N. (2001). The welfare state as piggy bank: Information, risk, uncertainty and the role of the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Burtless, G., & Quinn, J. (2001). Retirement trends and policies to encourage work among older Americans. In P. Budetti, R. Burkhauser, J. Gregory, & H. A. Hunt (Eds.), Ensuring health and income security for an aging workforce (pp. 375-416). Kalamazoo Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.
3. Diamond, P., & Hausman, J. 1984. Individual retirement and savings behavior. Journal of Public Economics 23, 81-114.
4. Haber, C., & Gratton, B. (1994). Old age and the search for security: An American social history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
5. Heisz, A., Jackson, A., & Picot, G. (2001). Distributional outcomes in Canada. In K. Banting, A. Sharpe, & F. St- Hilaire, (Eds.), The longest decade: Canada in the 1990s (pp. 247-272). Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
6. Hicks, P. (2001). Public support for retirement income reform. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved August 13, 2002, from the OECD Web site: http://www.oecd.org
7. Morissette, R., Zhang, X., & Drolet, M. (2002). The evolution of wealth inequality in Canada, 1984-1999 (Analytical Studies Branch, Research Paper No. 187). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
8. Myles, J. (2000). The maturation of Canada's retirement income system: Income levels, income inequality and low income among older persons. Canadian Journal on Aging, 19, 287-316.
9. Myles, J. (in press). A new social contract for the elderly? In G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, & J. Myles (Eds.). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Myles, J., & Pierson, P. (2001). The comparative political economy of pension reform. In P. Pierson (Ed.). The New Politics of the Welfare State (pp. 305-333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1996). Caring for frail elderly people. Paris: Author.
12. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001). Aging and income: Financial resources and retirement in 9 OECD countries. Paris: Author.
13. Pransky, G. (2001). Living longer but able to work? In P. Budetti, R. Burkhauser, J. Gregory, & H. A. Hunt (Eds.), Ensuring health and income support for an aging workforce (pp. 431-438). Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.
14. Scherer, P. (2002). Age of withdrawal from the labour force in OECD countries. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Retrieved August 13, 2002, from the OECD Web site: http://www.oecd.org
15. Thompson, L. (1998). Older and wiser: The economics of public pensions. Washington: The Urban Institute.
16. Wolf, D. (1999). The family as provider of long-term care: efficiency, equity and externalities. Journal of Aging and Health, 11, 360-382.