Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and follow-up of Crohn's disease - Is conventional enteroclysis still necessary?;Die magnetresonanztomographie in der diagnostik und verlaufsbeobachtung des morbus crohn - Ist das konventionelle enteroklysma noch erforderlich?

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 789-794

  Albert, J ^a   Scheidt, T ^a   Basler, B ^a   Pahle, U ^a   Schilling, D ^a   Layer, G ^a   Riemann, J F ^a   Adamek, Henning E ^a  

^a KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Endoscopy; Inflammatory bowel diseases; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Indexed keywords

ENEMA;

ABSCESS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPY; FISTULA; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COLON; COLONIC DISEASES; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL FISTULA; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0036744437     PISSN: 00442771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33875     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fauci AS et al. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. McGraw-Hill New York, N.Y. 1998; 1636
2. Rhodes AI, Shorvon PJ. Recent advances in small-bowel imaging: a review. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 2001; 17: 132-139
3. Edelman RR, Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 708-716
4. Toms AP, Barltrop A, Freeman AH. A prospective randomised study comparing enteroclysis with small bowel follow-through examinations in 244 patients. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1155-1160
5. Thoeni RF, Gould RG. Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time. Radiology 1991; 178: 659-662
6. Schunk K, Adamek HE. Diagnostik yon Erkrankungen des biliopankreatischen Systems und des Darms. - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Kernspintomographie. Internist 2001; 42: 507-515
7. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-Bowel Disease: Comparison of MR Enteroclysis Images with Conventional Enteroclysis and Surgical Findings. Radiology 2000; 215: 717-725
8. Rieber A, Wruk D, Nüssle K et al. MRT des Abdomens in Kombination mit der Enteroklyse bei Morbus Crohn unter der Verwendung yon oralem und intravenösem Gd-DTPA. Radiologe 1998; 38: 23-28
9. Patak MA, Froehlich JM, yon Weymarn C et al. Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 2001; 358: 987-988
10. Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, yon Ritter C et al. Dünndarm-MRT mit schnellen MR-Sequenzen bei Morbus Crohn nach Entemklysma mit oralen Eisenpartikeln. Radiologe 1998; 38: 29-36
11. Hansmann HJ, Hess T, Hahmann M et al. MRT bei chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen. RöFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001; 173: 4-11
12. Oberhuber E, Püspö A, Oesterreicher C et al. Focally enhanced gastritis: A frequent type of Gastritis in patients with Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterol 1997; 112: 698-706
13. DeSouza NM, Gilderale DJ, Coutts GA et al. MRI of fistula-in-ano: a comparision of endoanal coil with external phased array coil techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 357-363
14. Orsoni P, Barthet M, Portier F et al. Prospective comparison of endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscess complicating Crohn's disease. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 360-364
15. Desreumaux P, Ernst O, Geboes K et al. Inflammatory alterations in mesenteric adipous tissue in crohn's disease. Gastroenterol 1999; 117: 73-81
16. Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K et al. Hydro-MRI in Crohn's disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 2000; 35: 431-437