The trigonometric responder approach: A new method for detecting responders to pharmacological or experimental challenges

Pharmacopsychiatry

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 182-189

  Reuter, Martin ^a   Siegmund, A ^a   Netter, P ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; LISURIDE; PLACEBO; PROLACTIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RESPONSE; EMPIRICISM; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TRIGONOMETRIC RESPONDER APPROACH;

ALGORITHMS; AREA UNDER CURVE; DOPAMINE AGONISTS; HORMONES; HUMANS; LISURIDE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PHARMACOKINETICS; PLACEBOS;

EID: 0036744212     PISSN: 01763679     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34118     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cox DR, Stuart A. Some quick sign tests for trend in location and dispersion. Biometrika 1955; 42: 80-95
2. Cox DR. The analysis of binary data. London: Methuen, 1970
3. Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmakokinetics (2nd ed). New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982
4. Hennig J, Lange N, Haag A, Rohrmann S, Netter P. Reboxetine in a neuroendocrine challenge paradigm: evidence for high cortisol responses in healthy volunteers scoring high on subclinical depression. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2000; 3: 193-201
5. Lacey JI. The evaluation of autonomic responses: Toward a general solution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1956; 67: 123-164
6. Laub PB, Gallo JM. NCOMP - a windows based computer program for noncompartmental analysis of pharmacokinetic data. J Pharm Sci 1996; 85: 393-395
7. McCauley DL, Lum BL, Sikic BI. Effect of different mathematical methods on etoposide area under the curve estimations and pharmacodynamic response predictions. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996; 37: 286-288
8. Moore GH, Wallis WA. Time series significance tests based on sign differences. J Am Stat Assn 1943; 38: 153-164
9. Myrtek M, Foerster F. The law of initial value: A rare exception. Biol Psychol 1986; 22: 1-11
10. Perrier D, Mayersohn M. Noncompartmental determination of the staedy-state volume of distribution for any mode of administration. J Pharm Sci 1982; 71: 372-373
11. Purves RD. Bias and variance of extrapolated tails for area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC). J Pharmacokinet and Biopharm 1992; 20: 501-510
12. Purves RD. Numerical estimation of the noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters variance and coefficient of variation of residence times. J Pharm Sci 1994; 83: 202-205
13. Purves RD. Optimum numerical integration methods for estimation of area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC). J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1992; 20: 211-226
14. Reuter M, Netter P, Toll C, Hennig J. Dopamine agonist and antagonist responders as related to types of nicotine craving and facets of extra-version. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 2002: 26 (in press)
15. Reuter M, Netter P. The influence of personality on nicotine craving: A hierarchical multivariate statistical prediction model. Neuropsychobiology 2001: 44: 47-53
16. Rocci Jr ML, Jusko WJ. LAGRAN program for area and moments in pharmacokinetic analysis. Comp Prog Biomed 1983; 16: 203-216
17. Stemmler G. Implicit measurement models in methods for scoring physiological reactivity. J Psychophysiol 1987; 1: 113-125
18. Tai MM. A mathematical model for the determination of total area under glucose tolerance and other metabolic curves. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 152-154
19. Wilder J. Stimulus and response. The Law of Initial Value. Bristol: Wright, 1967
20. Yeh KC, Kwan KC. A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal Lagrange and spline approximation. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1978; 6: 79-98