Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 879-881

  Omary, Reed A ^a   Bettmann, Michael A ^b   Cardella, John F ^c   Bakal, Curtis W ^d   Schwartzberg, Mark S ^e   Sacks, David ^f   Rholl, Kenneth S ^g   Meranze, Steven G ^h   Lewis, Curtis A ⁱ  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ST LUKE S ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Reading Hospital and Medical Center ^*  (United States)

^f READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g INOVA ALEXANDRIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Archiving; Medical records

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; ULTRASOUND;

DOCUMENTATION; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS, PROBLEM-ORIENTED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 0036742595     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61769-2     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Fink A, Kosefcoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984; 74:979-983.
2. Leape LL, Hilborne LH, Park RE, et al. The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. JAMA 1993; 269:753-760.