Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: Incidence and relationship to disability

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 215-220

  Appelros, Peter ^a   Karlsson, Gunnel M ^a   Seiger, Åke ^a   Nydevik, Ingegerd ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular disorders; Epidemiology; Perceptual disorders

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANOSOGNOSIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN INJURY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISABILITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NEGLECT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION DISORDER; POPULATION RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; SWEDEN; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

AGED; AGNOSIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN;

EID: 0036741976     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/165019702760279206     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Heilman KM. Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, eds. Clinical Neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979, p. 268-307.
2. Starkstein SE, Fedoroff JP, Price TR, Leiguarda R, Robinson RG. Anosognosia in patients with cerebrovascular lesions. A study of causative factors. Stroke 1992; 23: 1446-1453.
3. Robertson IH, Halligan PW. Spatial neglect: A clinical handbook for diagnosis and treatment. Hove: Psychology Press; 1999.
4. Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, Soroker N. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 379-384.
5. Jehkonen M, Ahonen JP, Dastidar P, Koivisto AM, Laippala P, Vilkki J, et al. Visual neglect as a predictor of functional outcome one year after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2000; 101: 195-201.
6. Kalra L, Perez I, Gupta S, Wittink M. The influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1997; 28: 1386-1391.
7. Löfgren B, Nyberg L, Österlind PO, Mattsson M, Gustafson Y. Stroke rehabilitation - discharge predictors. Cerebrovasc Dis 1997; 7: 168-174.
8. Webster JS, Roades LA, Morrill B, Rapport LJ, Abadee PS, Sowa MV, et al. Rightward orienting bias, wheelchair maneuvering, and fall risk. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 924-928.
9. Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Hemineglect in acute stroke - incidence and prognostic implications: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 122-127.
10. Sudlow CL, Warlow CP. Comparing stroke incidence worldwide: what makes studies comparable? Stroke 1996; 27: 550-558.
11. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 1980; 58: 113-130.
12. Costello AD, Warrington EK. The dissociation of visuospatial neglect and neglect dyslexia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 1110-1116.
13. Bisiach E, Perani D, Vallar G, Berti A. Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia 1986; 24: 759-767.
14. Schubert F, Spatt J. Double dissociations between neglect tests: possible relation to lesion site. Eur Neurol 2001; 45: 160-164.
15. Jehkonen M, Ahonen JP, Dastidar P, Koivisto AM, Laippala P, Vilkki J. How to detect visual neglect in acute stroke. Lancet 1998; 351: 727-728.
16. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Behavioural Inattention Test. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987.
17. Tham K, Tegnér R. The Baking Tray Task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1996; 6: 19-25.
18. Zoccolotti P, Judica A. Functional evaluation of hemineglect by means of a semistructured scale: personal extrapersonal differentiation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1991; 1: 33-44.
19. Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 660-662.
20. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychological function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914-919.
21. Gainotti G, Giustolisi L, Nocentini U. Contralateral and ipsilateral disorders of visual attention in patients with unilateral brain damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 422-426.
22. Samuelsson H, Hjelmquist E, Naver H, Blomstrand C. Different criteria in the assessment of visuospatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995; 58: 114-115.
23. Trobe JD, Acosta PC, Krischer JP, Trick GL. Confrontation visual field techniques in the detection of anterior visual pathway lesions. Ann Neurol 1981; 10: 28-34.
24. Blanton PD, Gouvier WD. Sex differences in visual information processing following right cerebrovascular accidents. Neuropsychologia 1987; 25: 713-717.
25. Robertson I, Frasca R. Attentional load and visual neglect. Int J Neurosci 1992; 62: 45-56.
26. Robertson I. Anomalies in the laterality of omissions in unilateral left visual neglect: implications for an attentional theory of neglect. Neuropsychologia 1989; 27: 157-165.
27. Beschin N, Robertson IH. Personal versus extrapersonal neglect: a group study of their dissociation using a reliable clinical test. Cortex 1997; 33: 379-384.
28. Bisiach E, Vallar G, Perani D, Papagno C, Berti A. Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 1986; 24: 471-482.
29. Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis RC. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 1196-1202.
30. Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Frequency, determinants, and consequences of anosognosia in acute stroke. J Neurol Rehabil 1996; 10: 243-250.