Strategic technical management of housing stock: Lessons from Dutch housing associations

Building Research and Information

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 372-381

  Straub, A ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Building components; Building performance; Building stock; Defects; Facilities management; Housing; Maintenance; Occupants; Post occupancy; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

HOUSING; PUBLIC POLICY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

HOUSING STOCKS;

BUILDING COMPONENTS;

EID: 0036739006     PISSN: 09613218     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09613210210150955     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Addleon, L. (1989) Building Failures: A Guide to Diagnosis, Remedy, and Prevention, Butterworth Architecture, London.
2. Aedes (2000) Bedrijfstakinformatie [Branch deata], Aedes, Hilversum.
3. Chandler, I. (1995) The generation and use of stock condition surveys. Journal of the Institute of Maintenance and Building Management, 1(1).
4. Damen Consultants et al. (1996) Brite Euram Project 4213 Condition Assessment and Maintenance Strategies for Building and Building Components, Damen Consultants, Rotterdam.
5. Department of the Environment (1991) English House Condition Survey: 1991, HMSO, London.
6. Gruis, V. and Nieboer, N. (2001) A model for strategic stock management in social housing, in ENHR Conference, Housing and Urban Development in New Europe, June 2001, Pultusk-Warsaw, Poland.
7. Hermans, M.H. (1995) Deterioration Characteristics of Building Components: A Data Collection Model to Support Performance Management, TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven.
8. International Organization of Standardization (1984) International Standard ISO 6241, Performance Standards in Building - Principles for their Preparation and Factors to be Considered.
9. Ministerie van VROM (2001) Nota Wonen. Mensen, wensen, wonen [Policy document on housing], MVROM, Den Haag.
10. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (2001) Policy Document on Housing. [in Dutch]
11. Pitt, T.J. (1997) Data requirements for the prioritization of predictive building maintenance. Facilities, 15, 97-104.
12. Research Council of Norway. Some Results from the R&D-Program Building Management 1990-1994, Research Council of Norway, Oslo.
13. Shen, Q. and Spedding, A. (1998) Priority setting in maintenance - practical issues in using the multi-attribute approach. Building Research & Information, 26, 169-180.
14. Straub, A. (1998) State-of-the-art in maintenance policies by housing corporations in The Netherlands, in Lee Kiang Quah (ed.): Facilities Management and Maintenance: The Way Ahead into the Millennium. CIB W70 Singapore '98 Symposium, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, pp. 149-156.
15. Straub, A. (2000) Condition assessment: use of the six-point scale method in The Netherlands, in D. Shien-Shin Then (ed.): Facilities Management and Maintenance: Providing facilities Solutions to Business Challenges. CIB W70 Brisbane 2000 Symposium, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, pp. 359-366.
16. e eeuw. Professioneel, klantgericht en duurzaam [Technical Management by Housing Associations in the 21st Century], Delft University Press, Delft.