Controlling inbreeding by constraining the average relationship between parents of young bulls entering al progeny test programs

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 2376-2383

  Weigel, K A ^a   Lin, S W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Dairy cattle; Inbreeding; Progeny testing

Indexed keywords

BOS TAURUS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MALE;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; INBREEDING; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 0036731370     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74318-x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brisbane, J. R., and J. P. Gibson. 1995. Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationships in selection decisions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:421-431.
2. Grundy, B., B. Villaneuva, and J. A. Woolliams. 1998. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genet. Res. Cambridge 72:159-168.
3. Grundy, B., B. Villaneuva, and J. A. Woolliams. 2000. Dynamic selection for maximizing response with constrained inbreeding in schemes with overlapping generations. Anim. Sci. 70:373-382.
4. Meuwissen, T. H. E. 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 75:934-940.
5. Meuwissen, T. H. E., and M. E. Goddard. 1997. Optimization of progeny tests with prior information on young bulls. Livest. Prod. Sci. 52:57-68.
6. Meuwissen, T. H. E., and A. K. Sonesson. 1998. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding: overlapping generations. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2575-2583.
7. Smith, L. A., B. G. Cassell, and R. E. Pearson. 1998. The effects of inbreeding on the lifetime performance of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2729-2737.
8. Sonesson, A. K., B. Grundy, J. A. Woolliams, and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 2000. Selection with control of inbreeding in populations with overlapping generations: a comparison of methods. Anim. Sci. 70:1-8.
9. Weigel, K. A. 2001. Controlling inbreeding in modern breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E177-E184.
10. Weigel, K. A., and S. W. Lin. 2000. Use of computerized mate selection programs to control inbreeding of Holstein and Jersey cattle in the next generation. J. Dairy Sci. 83:822-828.
11. Wilk, J. C., and B. T. McDaniel. 1995. Influence of genetic diversity on viability in Randleigh Jerseys. J. Dairy Sci. 78(Suppl. 1):154. (Abstr.)
12. Woolliams, J. A., and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 1993. Decision rules and variance of response in breeding schemes. Anim. Prod. 56:179-186.
13. Wray, N. R., and M. E. Goddard. 1994. Increasing long-term response to selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26:431-451.