Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 320-328

  Mitchell, Christina A ^a   Pintado, Maria R ^b   Douglas, William H ^a,b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; DIAMOND; TUNGSTEN DERIVATIVE; PRODIGY; RESIN; REVOLUTION (COMPOSITE RESIN); TUNGSTEN CARBIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOFINISHING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; MORPHOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE; VISCOSITY; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; IATROGENIC DISEASE; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED TECHNIQUE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DIAMOND; HUMANS; IATROGENIC DISEASE; MOLAR; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ABRASION; TUNGSTEN COMPOUNDS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0036730202     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128150     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Lutz F, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. New finishing instruments for composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:575-80.
2. Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Vijayaraghavan TV, Nelson IK. The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: a profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:34-8.
3. Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996;21:53-8.
4. Hondrum SO, Fernandez R Jr. Contouring, finishing and polishing Class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997;22:30-6.
5. Jung M. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments. Oper Dent 1997;22:98-104.
6. Hoelscher DC, Neme AM, Pink FE, Hughes PJ. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998;23:36-42.
7. Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30:169-73.
8. Joniot SB, Gregoire GL, Auther AM, Roques YM. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins. Oper Dent 2000;25:311-5.
9. Fitzpatrick DA, Way DC. The effects of wear, acid etching, and bond removal on human enamel. Am J Orthod 1977;72:671-81.
10. Brown CR, Way DC. Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfelled adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978;74:663-71.
11. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod 1980;77:269-83.
12. Gwinnett AJ, Gorelick L. Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding: clinical application. Am J Orthod 1977;71:651-65.
13. Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:258-66.
14. Arcuri MR, Schneider RL, Strug RA, Clancy JM. Scanning electron microscope analysis of tooth enamel treated with rotary instruments and abrasives. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:483-90.
15. Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Geary L, Douglas WH. Retention of adhesive cement on the tooth surface after crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:668-77.
16. Roberson T, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, editors. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p. 338-9.
17. Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E, Miquel C. Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:742-9.
18. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW, Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mats 1994;10:269-74.
19. Wilson GS, Davies EH, von Fraunhofer JA. Micro-hardness characteristics of anterior restorative materials. Br Dent J 1980;148:37-40.