Comparison of pulpal sensitivity between a conventional and two resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 442-446

  Smales, R J ^a   Gale, M S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; FUJIPLUS; GLASS IONOMER; NEW FUJI I; RESIN; VITREMER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TOOTH CROWN;

ADULT; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 0036730175     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bebermeyer RD & Berg JH (1994) Comparison of patient-perceived post-cementation sensitivity with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements Quintessence International 25(3) 209-214.
2. Brackett WW & Metz JE (1992) Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 5 years in a general practice Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 67(1) 59-61.
3. Christensen GJ (1997a) Cements used for full crown restorations: A survey of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 9(1) 20-26.
4. Christensen GJ (1997b) Cementing porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns Journal of the American Dental Association 128(8) 1165-1167.
5. Clinical Research Associates Newsletter (1996) Resin reinforced glass ionomer (RRGI) cements, all-ceramic crown fracture 20(2) 3.
6. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA & Haselton DR (1999) Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 81(2) 135-141.
7. Johnson GH, Powell LV & DeRouen TA (1993) Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: Zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements Journal of the American Dental Association 124(11) 38-46.
8. Jokstad A & Mjör IA (1996) Ten years' clinical evaluation of three luting cements Journal of Dentistry 24(5) 309-315.
9. Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller HG & Strub JR (1996) Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 75(2) 159-162.
10. Klausner LH, Brandau HE & Charbeneau GT (1989) Glass-ionomer cements in dental practice: A national survey Operative Dentistry 14(4) 170-175.
11. McComb D (1996) Adhesive luting cements - classes, criteria and usage Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 17(8) 759-762.
12. Metz JE & Brackett WW (1994) Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 8 years in a general practice Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 71(1) 13-15.
13. Norman RD & Wright JS (1986) A comparison of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements via pulpal response Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 7(1) 41-43, 46-47.
14. Pameijer CH & Nilner K (1994) Long-term clinical evaluation of three luting materials Swedish Dental Journal 18(1-2) 59-67.
15. Reality Now (1995) Resin Ionomer Luting Cements 68 1.
16. Reality Now (1996) Resin Ionomer Luting Cements 75 4.
17. Technical Product Profile (1995) 3M Vitremer Luting Cement St Paul, 3M ESPE.
18. Tosaki S & Hirota K (1994) Current and future trends for light cured systems in Hunt PR ed Glass Ionomers: The next generation Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, p 35-46.