Guidance of shrinkage vectors vs irradiation at reduced intensity for improving marginal seal of class V resin-based composite restorations in vitro

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 510-515

  Hofmann, N ^a,c   Hiltl, O ^b   Hugo, B ^b   Klaiber, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology ^*  (Germany)

^c NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; POLYMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TETRIC;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HARDNESS; HUMAN; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; LIGHT; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; POLYMERS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0036729680     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Asmussen E & Peutzfeldt A (1999) Direction of shrinkage of light-curing resin composites Acta Odontologica Scandinavian 57(6) 310-315.
2. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA & Boyer DB (1997) Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces American Journal of Dentistry 10(2) 88-96.
3. Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA & Boyer DB (2000) Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photo-activated composite Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 12(1) 23-32.
4. Bouschlicher MR & Rueggeberg FA (2001) Effect of ramped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photo-activated composite Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 13 328-329.
5. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA, Rueggeberg F & Schuster GS (1991) Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites Biomaterials 12(8) 737-740.
6. Davidson CL & de Gee AJ (1984) Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites Journal of Dental Research 63(2) 146-148.
7. DeWald JP & Ferracane JL (1987) A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites Journal of Dental Research 66(3) 727-730.
8. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ & Davidson CL (1995) Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface European Journal of Oral Sciences 103(5) 322-326.
9. Ferracane JL (1985) Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins Dental Materials 1(1) 11-14.
10. Hansen EK (1983) After-polymerization of visible light activated resins: Surface hardness vs light source Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 91(5) 406-410.
11. rd & Suh BI (1999) Pulse activation: Reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins American Journal of Dentistry 12(3) 107-112.
12. Koran P & Kürschner R (1998) Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization American Journal of Dentistry 11(1) 17-22.
13. Lösche GM (1999) Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: Guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 1(1) 31-39.
14. Lutz E, Krejci I & Oldenburg TR (1986) Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique Quintessence International 17(12) 777-784.
15. Mehl A, Hickel R & Kunzelmann KH (1997) Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without "softstart- polymerization" Journal of Dentistry 25(3-4) 321-330.
16. Pearson GJ & Longman CM (1989) Water sorption and solubility of resin-based materials following inadequate polymerization by a visible-light curing system Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 16(1) 57-61.
17. Pilo R & Cardash HS (1992) Post-irradiation polymerization of different anterior and posterior visible light-activated resin composites Dental Materials 8(5) 299-304.
18. Rueggeberg FA & Craig RG (1988) Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite Journal of Dental Research 67(6) 932-937.
19. Sakaguchi RL & Berge HX (1998) Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites Journal of Dentistry 26(8) 695-700.
20. Suh BI & Wang Y (2001) Determining the direction of shrinkage in dental composites by changes in surface contour for different bonding configurations American Journal of Dentistry 14(2) 109-113.
21. Uno S & Asmussen E (1991) Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 99(5) 440-444.
22. Unterbrink GL & Muessner R (1995) Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems Journal of Dentistry 23(3) 183-189.
23. Watts DC, McNaughton V & Grant AA (1986) The development of surface hardness in visible light-cured posterior composites Journal of Dentistry 14(4) 169-174.
24. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF & Tagami J (2001a) The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different c-factor cavities Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(2) 177-183.
25. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF & Tagami J (2001b) A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations Dental Materials 17(4) 359-366.