Poor voice quality in future elite vocal performers and professional voice users

Journal of Voice

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 372-382

  Timmermans, B ^a,b   De Bodt, M S ^a   Wuyts, F L ^a   Boudewijns, A ^a   Clement, G ^a   Peeters, A ^a   Van de Heyning, P H ^a  

^a ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b University Hospital Brussels   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Actors; Occupational voice users; Theater and radio directors; Voice assessment; Voice quality

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPHONIA; EATING HABIT; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LARYNX DISORDER; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONATION; RISK FACTOR; SINGING; SMOKING; SPEECH REHABILITATION; VOCAL CORD; VOICE; ADOLESCENT; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0036728813     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00108-X     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Novák A, Vokřál J. Acoustic parameters for the evaluation of voice of future voice professionals. Folia Phoniatr Logoped. 1995;47:279-285.
2. Novák A, Dlouha O, Capkova B, Vohradnik M. Voice fatigue after theatre performance in actors. Folia Phoniatr. 1991: 43; 74-78.
3. Leino T, Rajamaki T. Voices on the air. Scandinavian Voice Research: Open symposium in honor of Aatto Sonninen; Sept. 14-15 1996; Hanasaari, Helsinki.
4. Nawka T, Anders LC, Cebulla M, Zurakowski D. The speaker's formant in male voices. J Voice. 1997;11:422-428.
5. Koufman JA, Isaacson G. Voice Disorders. Philadephia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1999.
6. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. European Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258:77-82.
7. Hirano M. Clinical application of voice tests. In: NIDCD monograph, ed. Assessment of Speech and Voice Production. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Md; 1990: 196-203.
8. Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:796-809.
9. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6:66-67.
10. De Bodt MS, Jacobson B, Musschoot S, et al. De Voice Handicap Index. Een instrument voor het kwantificeren van de psychosociale consequenties van stemstoornissen. Logopedie. 2000;13:29-33.
11. Van de Heyning PH, Remacle M, Van Cauwenberghe P. Functional assessment of voice disorders. Part II: research work of the Belgian Study Group on Voice Disorders (BSGVD). Acta Oto Rhino Laryngol Belgica. 1996;50:4.
12. OIVO-enquête over tabac. GO Nieuws. 2000;72:12-14.
13. Raphael BN, Scherer RC. Voice modifications of stage actors: acoustic analyses. J Voice. 1987;1:83-87.
14. Koufman JA, Blalock PD. Vocal fatigue and dysphonia in the professional voice user: Bogart-Bacall syndrome. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:493-498.
15. Harvey PL, Fuedo P, Aronson DB. Objective analysis of actors' voices: an initial report. J Voice. 1989;3:143-147.
16. Fuedo P, Harvey PL, Aronson DB. Objective analysis of actors' voices: comparative development across training. J Voice. 1992;6:267-270.
17. Roy N, Ryker KS, Bless DM. Vocal violence in actors: an investigation into its acoustic consequences and the effects of hygienic laryngeal release training. J Voice. 2000;14:215-230.