Wright-Fisher Revisited: The Case of Fertility Correlation

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 181-197

  Sibert, Alexandre ^a   Austerlitz, Frédéric ^b   Heyer, Évelyne ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Coalescent; Non genetic fertility correlation; Tree topology; Wright Fisher model

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; HERITABILITY;

MARTES PENNANTI;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FERTILITY; PEDIGREE; POPULATION GENETICS;

FERTILITY; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEDIGREE;

EID: 0036727404     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1609     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aldous D. Deterministic and stochastic models for coalescence (aggregation, coagulation): A review of the mean-field theory for probabilists. Bernoulli. 5:1999;3-48.
2. Aldous D. Stochastic models and descriptive statistics for phylogenetic trees, from Yule to today. Statist. Sci. 16:2001;23-34.
3. Austerlitz F., Heyer E. Social transmission of reproductive behavior increases frequency of inherited disorders in a young-expanding population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;15,140-15,144.
4. Caballero A. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity. 73:1994;657-679.
5. Campbell R. B. The coalescent time in the presence of background fertility selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55:1999;260-269.
6. Cannings C. The latent roots of certain Markov chains arising in genetics; a new approach. 1. Haploid models. Adv. Appl. Probab. 6:1974;260-290.
7. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. 1981;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
8. Donnelly P., Marjoram P. The effect on genetic sampling distributions of correlations in reproduction. Theor. Popul. Biol. 35:1989;22-35.
9. Donnelly P., Tavaré S. Coalescents and genealogical structure under neutrality. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29:1995;401-421.
10. Griffiths R. C., Tavaré S. Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 344:1994;403-410.
11. Harris T. E. The Theory of Branching Processes. 1963;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
12. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 141:1995;1605-1617.
13. Huestis R. R., Maxwell A. Does family size run in families? J. Hered. 23:1932;77-79.
14. Karlin, S., and McGregor, J.1963. Direct product branching processes and related induced Markov Chains, I. Calculations of rates of approach to homozygosity, Berkeley Seminar, pp. 111-145.
15. Kingman J. F. C. Exchangeability and the evolution of large populations. Koch G., Spizzichino F. Exchangeability in Probability and Statistics. 1982a;97-112 North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
16. Kingman J. F. C. The coalescent. Stochastic Process. Appl. 13:1982b;235-248.
17. Kirkpatrick M., Slatkin M. Searching for evolutionary patterns in the shape of phylogenetic trees. Evolution. 47:1993;1171-1181.
18. Krone S. M., Neuhauser C. Ancestral processes with selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51:1997;210-237.
19. Mode C. J. Multitype Branching Processes. Theory and Applications. 1971;American Elsevier Publishing Company, USA.
20. Möhle M. Robustness results for the coalescent. J. Appl. Probab. 35:1998;438-447.
21. Möhle M. Ancestral processes in population genetics - the coalescent. J. Theor. Biol. 204:2000;629-638.
22. Mosimann J. E. On the compound multinomial distribution, the multivariate β-distribution, and correlations among proportions. Biometrika. 49:1962;65-82.
23. Nordborg M. Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics. 146:1997;1501-1514.
24. Nordborg M. Coalescent theory. Balding D. J., Bishop M. J., Cannings C. Handbook of Statistical Genetics. 2001;179-212 John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
25. Przeworski M., Charlesworth B., Wall J. D. Genealogies and weak purifying selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;246-252.
26. Santiago E., Caballero A. Effective size and polymorphism of linked neutral loci in populations under directional selection. Genetics. 149:1998;2105-2117.
27. Schierup M. H., Hein J. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics. 156:2000;879-891.
28. Slatkin M., Hudson R. R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 129:1991;555-562.
29. Tavaré S. Line-of-descent and genealogical processes, and their applications in population genetics models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 26:1984;119-164.
30. Uyenoyama M. K. Genealogical structure among alleles regulating self-incompatibility in natural populations of flowering plants. Genetics. 147:1997;1389-1400.
31. Wilkinson-Herbots H. M. Genealogy and subpopulation differentiation under various models of population structure. J. Math. Biol. 37:1998;535-585.
32. Williams L. A., Williams B. J. A re-examination of the heritability of fertility in the British peerage. Soc. Biol. 21:1974;225-231.