Effect of adhesives on bond strength of porcelain veneer to base metal alloy

Quintessence International

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 595-599

  Goharian, Reza ^a   Maleknejad, Fatemeh ^a   Saiari, Taghi ^a   Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh ^a   Derhami, Mohammad ^a  

^a MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Adhesive; Base metal alloy; Bond strength; Porcelain veneer

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESIVE AGENT; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; DENTAL ALLOY; DUO CEMENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ONE COAT BOND; PANAVIA EX; PANAVIA TPN S; PANAVIA TPN-S; PHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILANE DERIVATIVE; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTURE; HEAT; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADHESIVES; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL VENEERS; HEAT; HUMANS; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; METHACRYLATES; PHOSPHATES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0036718880     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Chung KH, Hwang YC. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments, J Prosthet Dent 1997 ;78;267-274.
2. Bertolotti RL, Lacy AM, Watanabe LG. Adhesive monomers for porcelain repair, Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:483-4S9.
3. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR, Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain abstract 1154J, J Dent Res 1983;62:297.
4. Stangcl I, Nathanson D, Shear bond strength of composite hond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-1465.
5. Tylka DF, Stewart CR Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain composite repair, J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:12I-127.
6. Delia Bona A, Van Noort R, Shear vs tensile hond strength of resin composite bond to ceramic, J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-1596.
7. Burke FJT, Grey NJA, Repair of fractured porcelain units; alternative approaches, Br Dent J 1994;l76:251-256.
8. Kamada K, Yoshido K, Atsuta M, Effect of surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79 508-513.
9. Bello JA, Myers ML. Gräser GN, Jamis RH, Bond strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials, J Prosthet Denl 1985;45:788-797.
10. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW, Bond strength to composite resin of porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair system, J Prosthet Dent 1993;7O:6-I1.
11. Willams VD. Arnold AD, Aquilino SA. Bond versus rebond strengths of three luting agents for resin bonded fixed partial dentures, J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:289-292.
12. el-Sherif MH, el-Messery A, Halhoul MN, The effect of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resinbonded retainers, J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:782-785.
13. Ozcan M, Pteiffer P, Nergiz I, A brief historji of current status of metal and ceramic surface conditioning concepts for resin honding in dentistry. Quintessence Int 1998;29:713-724.
14. Pegoraro LF, Barrack GA. Comparison of bond strength of adhesive cast restorations using different designs, bonding agents, and luting resins. J Prosthel Dent 1987:57:133-138.
15. Czerw RJ, Wakefield CW. Robbins W, Fuikenion MS, Shear bond strength of composite resin to microelched metal with five newer-generation bonding agents, Oper Dent 1995:20:58-62.
16. Scotchbond Multipurpose Product Profile. Si Paul, MN:3M.
17. Silva E. Souza MG, Retief DH. Russell CM. Denys FR, Shear bond strength and microleakage of All-Bond. Am J Dent 1993:6:148-154.
18. Aboush YEY. Jenkins CGB. Tensile strength of enamel-resin metal, J Proslhet Dent 1989:61:688-694.
19. Frankenberge R, Kramer N, Sindle J, Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal ceramic and all-ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 2000 25:209-213.
20. Pameijer CH. Louw NP, Fischer D, Repairing fracture porcelain: How surface preparation affects shear force resistance. J Am Dent Assoc 1996 127:203-209.
21. Badawi BA, Sherif AH. Microleakage of oral microflora for porcelain and some porcelain repair materials-in vitro study. Egypt Dent J 1994:40:617-624.
22. Lacy AM. Clinical techniques for intraorai repair of fractured porcelain when metal is exposed. Quintessence Int 1989:2:595-598.
23. Burke FJT. Evtending tbe use of a 4-META material: Repair of fractured melal/ceramic crowns and bridges. Dent Update 1998:25:124-128.
24. Miller A, Miller B. Cole J. Comparison of Ihe fracture strengths of ceramometal versus several all ceramic crowns. J Prosdiet Dent 1992:68:38-1.
25. Wiltshire WA. TensQe bond strengths of various alloy surface treatments for resin bonded bridges. Quintessence DentTechnol 1986:10:227-232.
26. Omura I, Yamauchi J, Harada I, Wada T. Adhesive and mechatiical properties of a new dental adbesive abstract 561J. J Dent Res 1984:63:233.
27. Kem M. Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica-coating of dental alloys: Volume loss, morphology and changes on the surface composition. Dent Mater 1993:9:155-167.
28. Buonocore MG, A simple metbod of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955:34:849-853.
29. Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Denehy GE, Wefel JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994:73:44-55.
30. Philips RW. Science of Dental Materials, ed 9. Pbiladelphia:Saunders. 1991:487.
31. Sturdevani CM. Robinson TM. Hej-mann HO, Sturdevant JR. Tbe Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, ed 3, St Louis: Mosby, 1994:249
32. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 10. St Louis:Mosby, 1997:737.