A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: Is there a difference according to the surgical approach?

Journal of Urology

Volumn 168, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 991-994

  Korman, Howard J ^a   Leu, Patrick B ^a   Huang, Ray R ^a   Goldstein, Neal S ^a  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Pathology, surgical; Perineum; Prostate; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARAMETER; PATHOLOGIST; PERINEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; PUBIC BONE; SURGICAL APPROACH;

EID: 0036718451     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64558-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients
2. Radical perineal vs. retropubic prostatectomy: A review of optimal application and technical considerations in the utilization of these exposures
3. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update
4. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: A contemporary and anatomic approach
5. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy
6. Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening
7. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases
8. Retropubic prostatectomy
9. Total prostatovesiculectomy-retropubic approach
10. Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer
11. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerations
12. Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy
13. Comparison of radical perineal prostatectomy to radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer
14. Extraperitoneal endoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: A review of 125 patients
15. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: The perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions
16. Radical perineal prostatectomy: An update
17. Early prostate-specific antigen failure following radical perineal versus retropubic prostatectomy: The importance of seminal vesicle excision
18. Facilitated radical perineal prostatectomy with the Brooke Bookwalter retractor blade