|
|
Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 444-447
|
|
Is prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction warranted in the urban setting? The case against
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ALTEPLASE;
ANISTREPLASE;
FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;
ACUTE HEART INFARCTION;
BLEEDING;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CORONARY CARE UNIT;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DRUG SAFETY;
EMERGENCY WARD;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH CARE PLANNING;
HEALTH STATISTICS;
HOSPITAL CARE;
HUMAN;
LINEAR SYSTEM;
META ANALYSIS;
MORTALITY;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
NONLINEAR SYSTEM;
NURSE;
ONLINE SYSTEM;
PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL;
PATIENT CARE;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
SHORT SURVEY;
SURVIVAL;
TIME MANAGEMENT;
UNITED KINGDOM;
URBAN AREA;
|
|
EID: 0036713155
PISSN: 13510622
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.5.444 Document Type: Short Survey |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (18)
|
