A factorial design to optimize cell-based drug discovery analysis

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1221-1229

  Yi, Bingming ^a   Hughes Oliver, Jacqueline M ^a   Zhu, Lei ^b   Young, S Stanley ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE;

CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

ANTI HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS AGENT;

ARTICLE; CELL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG SCREENING; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STATISTICS;

ANTI-HIV AGENTS; CELLS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; HUMANS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0036708533     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci025509n     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McFarland, J.W.; Gans, D.J. On the Significance of Clusters in the Graphical Display of Structure-Activity Data. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 505-514.
2. Carhart, R.E.; Smith, D.H.; Venkataraghavan R. Atom Pairs as Molecular Features in Structure-activity studies: Definition and Applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
3. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Dixon, J.S.; Venkataraghavan, R. Topological Torsion: A New Molecular Descriptor for SAR Applications. Comparison with Other Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1987, 27, 82-85.
4. Hawkins, D.M.; Young, S.S.; Rusinko A. Analysis of a large structure-activity data set using recursive partitioning. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship 1997, 16, 296-302.
5. Young, S.S.; Hawkins, D.M. Using Recursive Partitioning to Analyze a Large SAR Data Set. Structure-Activity Relationship and Quan. Structure-Activity Relationship 1998, 8, 183-193.
6. Rusinko A.; Farmeu M.W.; Lambert C.G.; Brown P.L.; Young S.S. Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 38, 1017-1026.
7. Zhu, L.; Hughes-Oliver, J.M.; Young, S.S. Statistical Decoding of Potent Pools Based on Chemical Structure. Biometrics 2001, 57, 922-930.
8. Pearlman R.S.; Smith K.M. Metric Validation and the Receptor-Relevant Subspace Concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
9. Burden, F.R. Molecular Identification Number for Substructure Searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 225-227.
10. Lam, R.L.H. Design and Analysis of Large Chemical Databases for Drug Discovery; Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Waterloo, 2001.
11. Lam, R.L.H.; Welch W.J.; Young, S.S. Cell-Based Analysis for Large Chemical Databases. Technometrics 2002, submitted.
12. Kearsley, S.K.; Sallamack, S.; Fluder, E.M.; Andose, J.D.; Mosley, R.T.; Sheridan, R.P. Chemical Similarity Using Physiochemical Property Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 118-127.
13. Edgar, S.J.; Holliday, J.D.; Willett, P. Effectiveness of Retrieval in Similarity Searches of Chemical Databases: A Review of Performance Measures. J. Molecular Graphics. Modelling 2000, 18, 343-357.
14. Pearlman R.S.; Smith K.M. Novel Software tools for chemical diversity. Perspectives Drug Discovery Design 1998, 9-11, 339-353.
15. Stanton, D.T. Evaluation and Use of BCUT Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR Studies. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39(1), 11-20.
16. Lam, R.L.H.; Welch W.J.; Young, S.S. Uniform Coverage Designs for Molecule Selection. Technometrics 2002, 44, 99-109.
17. Engels M.F.; Venkatarangan P. Smart screening: Approaches to efficient HTS. Current Opinion Drug Discovery & Development 2001, 4(3), 275-283.