A calibration procedure for a digital instrument for electric power quality measurement

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 716-722

  Ferrero, Alessandro ^a,b   Lazzaroni, Massimo ^b   Salicone, Simona ^a,b  

^a IEEE   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

DSP based measuring instruments; Electric power quality measurement; Uncertainty estimation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY MARKET; UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERSION; CALIBRATION; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; ELECTRIC POWER MEASUREMENT; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

DIGITAL INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 0036703758     PISSN: 00189456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2002.803293     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J. Arillaga, M. H. J. Bollen, and N. R. Watson, "Power quality following deregulation," Proc. IEEE, vol. 88, pp. 246-261, Feb. 2000.
2. R. Sasdelli, G. Del Gobbo, and G. Iuculano, "Quality management for electricity as a processed material," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 49, pp. 460-467, Apr. 2000.
3. IEEE Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical Power Systems.
4. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-2: Limits - Limits for Harmonic Current Emissions (Equipment Input Current <=16 A per Phase) 1998.
5. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-4: Limits - Limitation of Emission of Harmonic Currents in Low-Voltage Power Supply Systems Equipment with Rated Current Greater Than 16 A, 1998.
6. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 3: Limits - Section 6: Assessment of Emission Limits for Distorting Loads in MV and HV Power Systems, 1996.
7. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-2: Limits - Limitation of Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker in Low-Voltage Supply Systems for Equipment with Rated Current < = 16 A. 1994.
8. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 3: Limits - Section 5: Limitation of Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker in Low-Voltage Power Supply Systems for Equipment with Rated Current Greater Than 16 A, 1994.
9. Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public Distribution Systems, Nov. 1994, CENELEC
10. IEEE Recommended Practice for Monitoring Electric Power Quality.
11. P. H. Swart, M. J. Case, and J. D. van Wyk, "On techniques for localization of sources producing distortion in three-phase networks," ETEP, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 391-396, 1996.
12. A. Ferrero, A. Menchetti, and R. Sasdelli, "Measurement of the electric power quality and related problems," ETEP, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 401-406, 1996.
13. C. Muscas, "Assessment of electric power quality: Indices for identifying disturbing loads," ETEP, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 287-292, 1998.
14. A. Ferrero, L. Peretto, and R. Sasdelli, "Revenue metering in the presence of distortion and unbalance: Myths and reality," presented at the 8th Int. Conf. Harmonics Quality Power ICHQP, Athens, Greece, 1998.
15. A. P. J. Rens and P. H. Swart, "On techniques for the localization of multiple distortion sources in three-phase networks: Time-domain verification," in 5th Int. Workshop Power Definitions Meas. Under Nonsinusoidal Conditions, Milano, Italy, Oct. 16-18, 2000.
16. L. Cristaldi, A. Ferrero, and S. Salicone, "A distributed system for electric power quality measurement," in IEEE IMTC/2001, Budapest, Hungary, May 21-23, 2001, pp. 2130-2135.
17. A. Carullo and M. Parvis, "Power meter for highly distorted three-phase systems," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 46, pp. 1262-1267, Dec. 1997.
18. R. Sasdelli, A. Ferrero, A. Menchetti, and L. Peretto, "About the accuracy of some proposed procedures for revenue metering under nonsinusoidal unbalanced conditions," ETEP, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 361-368, 1998.
19. A. Ferrero and C. Muscas, "On the selection of the "best" test waveform for calibrating electrical instruments under nonsinusoidal conditions," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 49, pp. 382-387, Apr. 2000.
20. G. Betta, C. Liguori, and A. Pietrosanto, "Structured approach to estimate the measurement uncertainty in digital signal elaboration algorithms," in IEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 146, 1999, pp. 21-26.
21. ____, "Propagation of uncertainty in a discrete Fourier transform algorithm," Measurement, vol. 27, pp. 231-239, 2000.
22. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1995/01.
23. 5500A Multi-Product Calibrator-Operator Manual, Fluke Corporation. 1994.