Mass transport in an ordered three-dimensional lattice-gas system panos argyrakis

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 543031-543039

  Argyrakis, Panos ^a   Chumak, Alexander A ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PARTICLE SIZE; STOICHIOMETRY;

EID: 0036696932     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. A.A. Chumak and A.A. Tarasenko, Surf. Sci. 91, 694 (1980).
2. D.A. Reed and G. Ehrlich, Surf. Sci. 105, 603 (1981).
3. V.P. Zhdanov, Surf. Sci. Lett. 149, L13 (1985).
4. G.L. Montet, Phys. Rev. B 7, 650 (1973).
5. R.A. Takhir-Kelly and R.J. Elliott, Phys. Rev. B 27, 844 (1983).
6. J.W. Haus and K.W. Kehr, Phys. Rep. 150, 263 (1987).
7. A.A. Chumak and C. Uebing, Eur. Phys. J. B 9, 323 (1999).
8. A.A. Chumak and C. Uebing, Eur. Phys. J. B 17, 713 (2000).
9. A. Danani, R. Ferrando, E. Scalas, and M. Torri, Surf. Sci. 402-404, 281 (1998).
10. A. Danani, R. Ferrando, E. Scalas, and M. Torri, Surf. Sci. 409, 117 (1998).
11. T. Hjelt, I. Vattulainen, J. Merikoski, T. Ala-Nissila, and S.C. Ying, Surf. Sci. 300, L501 (1997).
12. T. Hjelt, I. Vattulainen, J. Merikoski, T. Ala-Nissila, and S.C. Ying, Surf. Sci. 402-404, L253 (1998).
13. I. Vattulainen, Surf. Sci. 412/413, L911 (1998).
14. I. Vattulainen, J. Merikoski, T. Ala-Nissila, and S.C. Ying, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1896 (1998).
15. I. Vattulainen, S.C. Ying, T. Ala-Nissila, and J. Merikoski, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7697 (1999).
16. A.A. Tarasenko, F. Nieto, L. Jastrabik, and C. Uebing, Eur. Phys. J. D 12, 311 (2000).
17. A.A. Tarasenko, L. Jastrabik, F. Nieto, and C. Uebing, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8252 (1999).
18. A.A. Tarasenko, F. Nieto, L. Jastrabik, and C. Uebing, Phys. Rev. B 64, 075413 (2001).
19. A.A. Chumak and C. Uebing, Surf. Sci. 476, 129 (2001).
20. R. Kutner, K. Binder, and K.W. Kehr, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1846 (1983).
21. A. Sadiq and K. Binder, Surf. Sci. 128, 350 (1983).
22. 0)c and c, respectively. The curve T=0.3 corresponds to the value of φ = 1013 in the notation of our paper. This value of φ ensures a high ordering of the honeycomb lattice in the vicinity of c = 0.5. A simple calculation for c≈0.5 gives a value of σT that is by several times lower than that in Fig. 10(a) of Ref. 22. In our opinion, the version of path probability method employed in Ref. 22 is not sufficient to describe adequately the migration in a highly ordered state when a strong jump correlation occurs.
23. R. Gomer, Rep. Prog. Phys. 53, 917 (1990).
24. C. Uebing and R. Gomer, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7626 (1991).
25. G.S. Bokun, Ya.G. Groda, C. Uebing, and V.S. Vikhrenko, Physica A 296, 83 (2001).
26. A. A. Tarasenko, P. M. Tomchuk, and A. A. Chumak, Fluctuations in the bulk and on the surface of solids (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1992), p. 252 (in Russian).