Vortex interactions and thermally induced crossover from type-I to type-II superconductivity

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 645241-645248

  Hove, J ^a   Mo, S ^a   Sudbo A ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONDUCTANCE; LOW TEMPERATURE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHASE TRANSITION; THERMAL ANALYSIS; VORTEX MOTION;

EID: 0036696092     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064524     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. V.L. Ginzburg and L.D. Landau, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950) [Landau's Collected Papers (Gordon & Breach/Pergamon Press, 1965), Ch. 73, p. 546].
2. B.I. Halperin, T.C. Lubensky, and S.K. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 292 (1974).
3. S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1988 (1973).
4. The efforts of Refs. 2 and 3 appear to be among the first to seriously adress the principle of emergent order from disorder.
5. C. Dasgupta and B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1556 (1981).
6. J. Bartholomew, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5378 (1983).
7. S. Mo, J. Hove, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 65, 104501 (2002).
8. H. Kleinert, Lett. Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 35, 405 (1982).
9. It is customary to describe as tricritical any point in a parameter space at which a continuous transition becomes discontinuous, irrespective of the number of phases which coexist along the first-order line or surfaces of critical points which, in a suitably enlarged parameter space may be found to meet here (Ref. 10).
10. I. D. Lawrie and S. Sarbach in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic Press, New York, 1984).
11. 4 term, and the theory would yield nicely to renormalization group treatment of the sort that has been successful for Helium IV. In fact, there exists a dual formulation of the three-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau theory which is a new Ginzburg-Landau theory with such a massive gauge-field, see Refs. 7, 8, 12, and 13.
12. Z. Tešanović, Phys. Rev. B 59, 6449 (1999).
13. A.K. Nguyen and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 307 (1999).
14. J. Hove, S. Mo, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2368 (2000).
15. A.A. Abrikosov [Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1174 (1957).
16. H.B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 61, 45 (1973).
17. E. Müller-Hartmann, Phys. Lett. 23, 521 (1966); 23, 619 (1966).
18. E. Müller-Hartmann, Phys. Lett. 23, 521 (1966); 23, 619 (1966).
19. L. Jacobs and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. B 19, 4486 (1979).
20. L. Kramer, Phys. Rev. B 3, 3821 (1971).
21. E.B. Bogomol'nyi, Yad. Fiz. 24, 861 (1976) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 449 (1976)].
22. I. Luk'yanchuk, Phys. Rev. B 63, 174504 (2001).
23. H. Kleinert and F.S. Nogueira, cond-mat/0104573 (unpublished).
24. J. Auer and H. Ullmaier, Phys. Rev. B 7, 136 (1973).
25. K. Maki, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 21 (1964); G. Eilenberger, Phys. Rev. 153, 584 (1967). Also see Ref. 23, Sec. III E.
26. K. Maki, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 21 (1964); G. Eilenberger, Phys. Rev. 153, 584 (1967). Also see Ref. 23, Sec. III E.
27. M. Laine and A. Rajantie, Nucl. Phys. B 513, 471 (1998) hep-lat/9705003.
28. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, T. Neuhaus, A. Rajantie, and K. Rummukainen, Nucl. Phys. B 559, 395 (1999).
29. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B 466, 189 (1996).
30. P. Dimopoulos, K. Farakos, and G. Koutsoumbas, Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 489 (2000).
31. J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 753 (2000).
32. S. Mukhin, W. van Saarloos, and J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. B 64, 115105 (2001).