Alternating exposure to two compound flavors creates inhibitory associations between their unique features

Animal Learning and Behavior

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 201-207

  Dwyer, D M ^a   Mackintosh, N J ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPPERMINT; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXPOSURE; FLAVOR; LEMON; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; SODIUM DEPLETION; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; STIMULATION;

ANIMALIA; CITRUS LIMON; MENTHA X PIPERITA;

EID: 0036695894     PISSN: 00904996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192829     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Artigas, A. A., Chamizo, V. D., & Peris, J. M. (2001). Inhibitory associations between neutral stimuli: A comparative approach. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 46-65.
2. Beauchamp, G. K., & Mason, J. R. (1991). Comparative hedonics of taste. In R. C. Bolles (Ed.), The hedonics of taste (pp. 159-184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bennett, C. H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1999). Comparison and contrast as a mechanism of perceptual learning? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 253-272.
4. Bennett, C. H., Scahill, V. L., Griffiths, D. P., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1999). The role of inhibitory associations in perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 333-345.
5. Dwyer, D. M., Bennett, C. H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2001). Evidence for inhibitory associations between the unique elements of two compound flavors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 97-109.
6. Espinet, A., Iraola, J. A., Bennett, C. H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1995). Inhibitory associations between neutral stimuli in flavoraversion conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 361-368.
7. Ewing, M. F., Larew, M. B., & Wagner, A. R. (1985). Distribution-of-trials effects in Pavlovian conditioning: An apparent involvement of inhibitory backward conditioning with short intertrial intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 537-547.
8. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Graham, S. (1999). Retrospective revaluation and inhibitory associations: Does perceptual learning modulate our perception of the contingencies between events? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 159-185.
10. Mackintosh, N. J., Kaye, H., & Bennett, C. H. (1991). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 297-322.
11. Maier, S. F., Rapaport, P., & Wheatley, K. L. (1976). Conditioned inhibition and the UCS-CS interval. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 217-220.
12. McLaren, I. P. L., Kaye, H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102-130). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
13. McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246.
14. Rescorla, R. A., & Furrow, D. R. (1977). Stimulus similarity as a determinant of Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 203-215.
15. Symonds, M., & Hall, G. (1995). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common elements. Learning & Motivation, 26, 203-219.
16. Wagner, A. R., & Larew. M. B. (1985) Opponent processes and Pavlovian inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 223-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.