Self-etching vs. traditional bonding systems in orthodontics: An in vitro study

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 166-169

  Velo, Stefano ^a   Carano, Alessandro ^a   Carano, Aldo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adhesive systems; Bonding; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; TRANSBOND;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; STATISTICS; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0036691598     PISSN: 16016335     EISSN: 16016343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.02193.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955;34: 49-53.
2. Ewoldsen N, Beatty MW, Erickson L. Effects of enamel conditioning on bond strength with a restoration light-cured glass ionomer. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:621-4.
3. Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different brackets types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978;74:62-77.
4. Munoz CA, Dunn JR. Clinical Evaluation of a New Self-Etching Dentin Bonding System (LP-2) Using Class III and V Restorations, Report to ESPE. Loma Linda, CA: 1999, University School of Dentistry.
5. Nunes MF, Perdigao B. The effect of an experimental one application self-conditioning adhesive on microleakage. J Dent Res 1999;78: (IADR abstract no. 1602).
6. Reinhardt KJ. Einsatz von Phosphorsaureestern als dentin-haftvarmittler. Phillips J 1998;15:335-42.
7. Vargas MA. Interfacial ultrastructure of a self-etching primeradhesive. J Dent Res 1999;306: (IADR absrtact no. 950).
8. Miller RA. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod 2001;1:42-5.
9. White LW. An expedited indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod 2001;1:36-41.
10. Maijer R, Smith DC. Variables influencings the bond strength of metal orthodontics bracket bases. Am J Orthod 1981;79:20-34.
11. Reynold IR. A rewiew of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1979;2:171-8.
12. Beress A, Tjan AHL. Bond strenghts of two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cements. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:299-302.
13. Bishara SE, Von Wald L, Laffoon J, Jakobsen JR. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:288-94.
14. Coury TL, Miranda FJ. Adhesiveness of glass-ionomer cement to enamel and dentine. A laboratory study. Operative Dent 1981; 7:2-6.
15. Fricker JP. A 12 months clinical evaluation of a light actived glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:502-5.
16. Klockowski R, Davis I, JoYnt R, Wieczkoski G, McDonald A. On strength and durability of glass ionomer cements used as bonding agents in the placements of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1989;96:50-64.
17. Murray GA, Yates JL. A comparison of the bond strengths of composite resin glass and glass ionomer cements. J Pedodontics 1984;8:172-7.
18. Garcia-Godoy F. Bond Strength of Prompt L-Pop to Enamel and Dentin. Report to ESPE. San Antonio, TX: 1999, University of Texas Health Science Center.
19. Brosnihan J, Safranek L. Orthodontic bonding: the next generation. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:614-6.
20. Evans R, Oliver R. Orthodontic bonding using glass-ionomer cement: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:483.