Creating stimuli for the study of biological-motion perception

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 375-382

  Dekeyser, Mathias ^a   Verfaillie, Karl ^a   Vanrie, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VIDEORECORDING;

BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; SOFTWARE; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0036691361     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195465     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AHLSTRÖM, V., BLAKE, R., & AHLSTRöM, U. (1997). Perception of biological motion. Perception, 26, 1539-1548.
2. AUTODESK, INC. (1997). Autodesk 3D Studio Max (Release 2). Sausalito, CA: Author.
3. AUTODESK, INC. (1998). Character Studio Max (Release 2). Sausalito, CA: Author.
4. BERTENTHAL, B. I. (1993). Infants' perception of biomechanical motions: Intrinsic image and knowledge-based constraints. In C. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy (pp. 175-214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. BERTENTHAL, B. I., PROFFITT, D. R., SPETNER, N. B., & THOMAS, M. A. (1985). The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions. Child Development, 56, 531-543.
6. BONDA, E., PETRIDES, M., OSTRY, D., & EVANS, A. (1996). Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 3737-3744.
7. CUTTING, J. E. (1978a). Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through manipulation of a biomechanical invariant. Perception, 7, 393-405.
8. CUTTING, J. E. (1978b). A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10, 91-94.
9. CUTTING, J. E. (1981). Coding theory adapted to gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 71-87.
10. CUTTING, J. E., & KOZLOWSKI, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353-356.
11. FORSBURG, J. A. (Producer) (1998a). Character Studio 2.0 advanced techniques [Film]. (Available from NUimage Labs, Inc., P.O. Box 128, Cary, NC 27512)
12. FORSBURG, J. A. (Producer) (1998b). Introduction series: Character Studio 2.0 [Film]. (Available from NUimage Labs, Inc., P.O. Box 128, Cary, NC 27512)
13. HODGINS, J. K. (1998, March). Animating human motion. Scientific American, 278, 64-70.
14. HODGINS, J. K., O'BRIEN, J. F., & TUMBLIN, J. (1998). Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, 4, 307-317.
15. HOENKAMP, E. (1978). Perceptual cues that determine the labeling of human gait. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 4, 59-69.
16. JOHANSSON, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
17. LANKES, R. (1998a). Character Studio 2 [Review]. Visual Magic Magazine, 16. Retrieved October 22, 1999, from http://visualmagic.awn.com/ nov98/cs2.html.
18. LANKES, R. (1998b). 3D Studio 2.5 [Review]. Visual Magic Magazine, 16. Retrieved October 22, 1999, http://visualmagic.awn.com/mag/ sept98/max2_5.html.
19. MAAS, J. B., JOHANSSON, G., JANSSON, G., & RUNESON, S. (1971). Motion perception I: 2-dimensional motion [Film]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. MAREY, E. J. (1894). Le mouvement. Paris: Masson.
21. MATHER, G., RADFORD, K., & WEST, S. (1992). Low-level visual processing of biological motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 249, 149-155.
22. MATHER, G., & WEST, S. (1993). Recognition of animal locomotion from dynamic point-light displays. Perception, 22, 759-766.
23. MULDER, A. (1994). Human movement tracking technology (Tech. Rep. 94-1). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, School of Kinesiology.
24. MUYBRIDGE, E. (1955). The human figure in motion. Mineola, NY: Dover.
25. NILSSON, L.-G., OLOFSSON, U., & NYBERG, L. (1992). Implicit memory of dynamic information. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 265-267.
26. OXFORD METRICS LTD (1997). Body Builder (Version3.5). Oxford: Author.
27. PEPPER'S GHOST PRODUCTIONS, LTD (1999). Muybridge variations. Kingston-upon-Thames, U.K.: Author.
28. PROFFITT, D. R., BERTENTHAL, B. I., & ROBERTS, R. J., JR. (1984). The role of occlusion in reducing multistability in moving point-light displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 315-323.
29. RUNESON, S. (1994). Perception of biological motion: The KSD-principle and the implications of a distal versus proximal approach. In G. Jansson, S. S. Bergström, & W. Epstein (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects (pp. 383-405). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. THOMAS, S. M., & JORDAN, T. R. (2001). Techniques for the production of point-light and fully illuminated video displays from identical recordings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 33, 59-64.
31. VERFAILLIE, K. (1993). Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 992-1013.
32. VERFAILLIE, K. (2000). Visual perception of human locomotion: Priming effects in direction discrimination. Brain & Cognition, 44, 192-213.
33. VERFAILLIE, K., & DAEMS, A. (2002). Representing and anticipating human actions in vision. Visual Cognition, 9, 217-232.
34. VERFAILLIE, K., DE TROY, A., & VAN RENSBERGEN, J. (1994). Transsaccadic integration of biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 649-670.