Request solicitation and semantic evocation of freedom: An evaluation in a computer-mediated communication context

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 208-212

  Guéguen, Nicolas ^a   Jacob, Céline ^b   Pascual, Alexandre ^c   Morineau, Thierry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FREEDOM; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; SEMANTICS;

ADVERTISING; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; FREEDOM; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0036691307     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.1.208     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. BROWN, P., & LEVINSON, S. (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univer. Press.
2. BURGER, J. (1986) Increasing compliance by improving the deal: the that's-not-all technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 277-283.
3. CIALDINI, R., CACIOPPO, J , BASSETT, R., & MILLER, J. (1978) Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: commitment then cost. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 463-476.
4. CIALDINI, R., & SCHROEDER, D. (1976) Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: when even a penny helps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 599-604.
5. CIALDINI, R., VINCENT, J., LEWIS, S., CATALAN, J., WHEELER, D., & LEE DARBY, B. (1975) Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: the door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206-215.
6. ENZLE, M., & HARVZY, M. (1982) Rhetorical request for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 172-176.
7. FREEDMAN, J., & FRASER, S. (1966) Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.
8. GOULDNER, A. (1960) The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
9. GUÉGUEN, N., & PASCUAL, A. (2000) Evocation of freedom and compliance: the "but you are free of . . ." technique. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5, 264-270.
10. GUÉGUEN, N., & PASCUAL, A. (in press) Reciprocity rules and compliance to a request: an experimental evaluation in a natural setting. Psychology and Education.
11. HOWARD, D. (1990) The influence of verbal responses to common greetings on compliance behavior: the foot-in-the-mouth effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1185-1196.
12. JOULE, R-V., GOUILLOUX, F., & WEBER, F. (1989) The lure: a new compliance procedure. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 741-749.
13. KIESLER, C. (1971) The psychology of commitment. New York: Academic Press.
14. PASCUAL, A., & GUÉGUEN, N. (2002) La technique du "Vous êtes libre de . . .": Induction d'un sentiment de liberté et soumission àune requête ou le paradoxe d'une liberté manipulatrice. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 15, 51-80.
15. REEVES, R., MACOLINI, R., & MARTIN, R. (1987) Legitimizing paltry contributions: on-the-spot vs mail-in-requests. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 731-738.
16. REEVES, R., & SAUCER, P. (1993) A test of commitment in legitimizing paltry contributions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 537-544.
17. REGAN, D. (1971) Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 627-639.
18. TAKEMURA, K. (1993) The effect of interpersonal sentiments on behavioral intention of helping behavior among Japanese students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 675-681.