Comparative Study of the Physical Properties of Core Materials

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 355-363

  Saygili, Gülbin ^a   Şahmali, Sévil M ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CEMENT; CHELON SILVER; COMPOMER; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; DURALLOY; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE; SILVER; SILVER DERIVATIVE; SPECTRUM COMPOSITE RESIN; TI CORE COMPOSITE RESIN; TI-CORE COMPOSITE RESIN; TITANIUM; TPH HYBRID; VITREMER; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMIDITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; STATISTICS; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; TOOTH CROWN;

CERMET CEMENTS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PLIABILITY; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATES; SILVER; SILVER COMPOUNDS; STATISTICS; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; WATER;

EID: 0036688456     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Combe EC, Shaglouf A-MS, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Dent Mater 1999;15:158-165.
2. Huysmans MC, Van der Varst PG. Finite element analysis of quasistatic and fatigue failure of post and cores. J Dent 1993;21:57-64.
3. Huysmans MC, Van der Varst PG. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations. Dent Mater 1995;11:252-257.
4. Nicholls JI. Crown retention. Part I. Stress analysis of a restored symmetric restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:179-184.
5. Yettram AI, Wright KW, Pickard HM. Finite element analysis of the crowns of normal and restored teeth. J Dent Res 1976;55: 1004-1011.
6. George CC, Kaneko LM, Donovan TE, White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:272-276.
7. Cattani-Lorente M-A, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer J-M. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999;15:71-78.
8. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 10. St Louis: Mosby, 1997.
9. Cohen BL, Condos S, Deutsch AS, Musicant BL. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a titanium composite resin material with dentinal bonding agents versus glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:904-909.
10. Levartovsky S, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. Shear bond strength of several new core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75: 154-158.
11. Varga J, Matsumara H, Masuhara E. Bonding of amalgam filling to tooth cavity with adhesive resin. Dent Mater J 1986;5:158-164.
12. Staninec M. Retention of amalgam restorations. Undercuts versus bonding. Quintessence Int 1989;20:351-374.
13. Christensen GJ, Hunsaker KJ, Bangerter V, Christensen R. Influence of amalgam bond on molar cusp fracture resistance [abstract 279]. J Dent Res 1991;70:300.
14. Eakle WS, Maxwell EH, Braly V. Fracture of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:215-218.
15. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68: 257-260.
16. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Maya F, Payan J, Meyer JM. Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin modified glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater 1999;15:21-32.
17. Levartovsky S, Kujinu E, Georgescu M, Goldstein GR. A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass-ionomer material. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:481-485.
18. DeWald JP, Arcoria CJ, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of glass-cermet cores under cast crowns. Dent Mater 1990;6:129-132.
19. Lloyd CH, Butchart DG. Retention of core composites, glass-ionomers, and cermets by self-threading dentin pins: The influence of fracture toughness upon failure. Dent Mater 1990;6:185-188.
20. Robbins JW, Cooley RL, Barnwell S. Fracture resistance of reinforced glass-ionomer as a core build-up material. Oper Dent 1990;15:23-26.
21. Haller B, Gotze W, Weiss G. Parapulpal pins and their effects on the fracture resistance of pin retained cores. J Oral Rehabil 1991;18:459-469.
22. Kao EC. Fracture resistance of pin-retained amalgam, composite resin and alloy reinforced glass ionomer core-material. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:463-471.
23. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:584-590.
24. Yaman P, Thorsteinsson TS. Effect of core materials on stress distribution of posts. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:416-420.
25. Huysmans MC, Van der Varst PG, Schafer R, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ, Soltes U. Fatigue behavior of direct post-and-core-restored premolars. J Dent Res 1992;71: 1145-1150.
26. Iglesias AM, Sorensen SE, Carter JM, Wilko RA. Some properties of high-copper amalgam alloys comparing hand to mechanical trituration. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:194-198.
27. Mahler DB, Terkla LG, Van Eysden J, Reisbick MH. Marginal fracture vs mechanical properties of amalgam. J Dent Res 1970;49:1452-1457.
28. Cattani-Lorente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM. Early strength of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1993;9:57-62.
29. Bapna MS, Mueller HJ. Fracture toughness, diametral strength and fractography of amalgam to amalgam bonds. Dent Mater 1993;9:51-56.
30. Tam LE, Pulver E, Mc Comb D, Smith DC. Physical properties of proprietary light-cured lining materials. Oper Dent 1991; 16:210-217.
31. Eliades G, Palajhias G. In vitro characterization of visible light cured glass-ionomer liners. Dent Mater 1993;9:198-203.
32. Arcoria CJ, Dewald JP, Moody CR, Ferracane JL. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16:301-307.
33. Cooley RL, Robbins JW, Barnwell S. Dimensional stability of glass ionomer used as a core material. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:651-653.
34. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass-ionomers. Dent Mater 1994;10:78-82.
35. Nicholson JW, Anstice HM, McLean JW. A preliminary report on the effect of storage in water on the properties of commercial light-cured glass ionomer cements. Br Dent J 1992;173:98-101.
36. Williams PD, Smith DC. Measurement of the tensile strength of dental restorative materials by use of a diametral compression test. J Dent Res 1971;50:436-442.
37. Olivia RA, Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of silver amalgam and composite used as core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57:554-559.
38. Olivia RA, Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of composite used as a core material. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:554-561.