메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 339-353

Responsive assessment and the freedom to think for ourselves

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REVIEW;

EID: 0036677962     PISSN: 00905550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.47.3.339     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (6)

References (64)
  • 1
    • 85046523743 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology policy on the use of non-doctoral-level personnel in conducting clinical neuropsychological evaluations
    • (1999) The Clinical Neuropsychologist , vol.13 , pp. 385
  • 2
    • 0029810387 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment: Neuropsychological testing of adults. Considerations for neurologists
    • (1996) Neurology , vol.47 , pp. 592-599
  • 6
    • 0032848602 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient advocacy at risk: Ethical, legal, and political dimensions of adverse reimbursement practices in brain injury rehabilitation in the US
    • (1999) Brain Injury , vol.13 , pp. 745-758
    • Banja, J.1
  • 20
    • 0005564556 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 US 529 (1993)
  • 41
    • 0034131099 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of neuropsychology test technicians in clinical practice: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology
    • (2000) Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology , vol.15 , pp. 381-382


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.