A survey of entry techniques and complications of members of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 264-266

  Kaloo, Philip ^a   Cooper, Michael ^b,d   Molloy, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Queensland Fertility Group   (Australia)

^d NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORGAN INJURY; PERITONEUM ADHESION; POSTAL MAIL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPERITONEUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0036669135     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00264.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Garry R. Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc. 1999; 8: 315-326.
2. Mintz M. Risks and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases. J Reprod Med. 1977 May; 18 (5): 269-272.
3. Patel DN, Parikh MN, Nanavati MS, Jussawalla MJ. Complications of laparoscopy. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Mar; 11 (1): 87-91.
4. Phillips JM, Hulka JF, Peterson HB. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1982 membership survey. J Reprod Med. 1984 Aug; 29 (8): 592-594.
5. O'Callaghan D, Maher PJ, Hill DJ. Complications of closed laparoscopy: is the Veress needle safe? Aust N Z J Surg. 1996 Aug; 66 (8): 505-507.
6. Howard FM, El-Minawi AM, DeLoach VE. Direct laparoscopic cannula insertion at the left upper quadrant. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Nov; 4 (5): 595-600.
7. Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanoski MP, Hetz SP, Rich NM. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg. 1996 Aug; 224 (2): 145-154.
8. Penfield AJ. How to prevent complications of open laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1985 Sep; 30 (9): 660-663.
9. Cogliandolo A, Manganaro T, Saitta FP, Micali B. Blind versus open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Oct; 8 (5): 353-355.
10. Zaraca F, Catarci M, Gossetti F, Mulieri G, Carboni M. Routine use of open laparoscopy: 1,006 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999 Feb; 9 (1): 75-80.
11. Decloedt J, Berteloot P, Vergote I. The feasibility of open laparoscopy in gynecologic-oncologic patients. Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Jul; 66 (1): 138-140.
12. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Annibali R, Litke BS. Gallbladder and gallstone removal, open versus closed laparoscopy, and pneumoperitoneum. Am J Surg 1993 Apr; 165 (4): 497-504.
13. Bergqvist D, Bergqvist A. Vascular injuries during gynecologic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987; 66 (1): 19-23.
14. Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Kurki T. Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul; 94 (1): 94-98.
15. Bateman BG, Kolp LA, Hoeger K. Complications of laparoscopy - operative and diagnostic. Fertil Steril. 1996 Jul; 66 (1): 30-35.
16. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May; 104 (5): 595-600.
17. Chamberlain G. Confidential inquiry into gynaecological laparoscopy. Br Med J. 1978 Aug 19; 2 (6136): 563.