Factors associated with short form-36 outcomes in nonoperative treatment for ipsilateral fractures of the clavicle and scapula

Orthopedics

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 733-738

  Edwards, Scott G ^a   Wood III, George W ^b   Whittle, A Paige ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLAVICLE FRACTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FRACTURE DISLOCATION; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT MOBILITY; MUSCLE EXERCISE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCAPULA; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLAVICLE; FRACTURES, BONE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; IMMOBILIZATION; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCAPULA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036665348     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Codman EA. Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. In: The Shoulder: Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and Other Lesions in or about the Subacromial Bursa. Melbourne, Fla: Krieger Publishing Co; 1934:152-154.
2. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek A. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993; 31:247-263.
3. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30:473-483.
4. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument of measuring clinically-important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 1988; 1:95-108.
5. Gatchel RJ, Mayer T, Dersh J, Robinson R, Polatin P. The associaton of the SF-36 health status survey with 1-year socioeconomic outcomes in a chronically disabled spinal disorder population. Spine. 1999; 24:2162-2170.
6. Kantz ME, Harris WJ, Levitsky K, Ware JE Jr, Davies AR. Methods for assessing condition specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care. 1992; 30(suppl):MS240-MS252.
7. Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine. 1995; 20:1899-1909.
8. Taylor SJ, Taylor AK, Foy MA, Fogg AJ. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine. 1999; 24:1805-1812.
9. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992; 305:160-164.
10. Chertow GM, Trimbur T, Karlson EW, Lazarus JM, Kay J. Performance characteristics of a dialysis-related amyloidosis questionnaire. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7:1235-1240.
11. Dougherty CM, Dewhurst T, Nichol WP, Spertus J. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51:569-575.
12. Jenkinson C, Jenkinson D, Shepperd S, Layte R, Petersen S. Evaluation of treatment for congestive heart failure in patients aged 60 years and older using generic measures of health status (SF-36 and COOP charts). Age Ageing. 1997; 26:7-13.
13. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers WH, Raczek AE, Lu JF. The validity and relatively precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1992; 30(suppl):MS253-MS265.
14. Rector TS, Ormaza SM, Kubo SH. Health status of heart transplantation: a preliminary evaluation of the SF-36 questinnaire. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993; 12:983-986.
15. Stewart AL, Ware JE. Measuring Functionality and Well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992.
16. Tarlov AR, Ware JE JR, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 1989; 262:925-930.
17. Fern KT, Smith JT, Zec B, Lee A, Borschneck D, Pichora Dr, Trauma patients with multiple extremity injuries: resource utilization and long-term outcome in relation to injury severity scores. J Trauma. 1998; 45:489-494.
18. Gallay SH, Hupel TM, Beaton DE, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Functional outcome of acromioclavicular joint injury in polytrauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12:159-163.
19. Loucks C, Buckley R, Bohler's angle: correlation with outcome in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13:554-558.
20. Otsuka NY, McKee MD, Liew A, et al. The effect of comorbidity and duration of nonunion on outcome after surgical treatment for nonunion of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:127-133.
21. Ponzer S, Nasell H, Bergman B, Tornkvist T. Functional outcome and quality of life in patients with type B ankle fractures: a two-year follow-up study. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13;363-368.
22. Ada JR, Miller ME. Scapular fractures. Analysis of 113 cases. Clin Orthop. 1991; 269:174-180.
23. Albrecht HU, Bamert P. The clavicular fracture: treatment and complications [German]. Helv Chir Acta. 1982; 48:571-583.
24. Hardegger FH, Simpson LA, Weber BG. The operative treatment of scapular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984; 66:725-731.
25. Herscovici D Jr, Fiennes Ag, Allgower M, Ruedi TP. The floating shoulder: ipsilateral clavicle and scapular neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:362-364.
26. Judet R. Traitement chirurgical des fractures de l'omoplate, indication operatoires, Helv Chir Acta. 1974; 41:225-232.
27. Leung KS, Lam TP. Open reduction and internal fixation of ipsilateral fractures of the scapula and clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75:1015-1018.
28. Magerl F. Osteosyntheses in the shoulder region. Pertubercular humeral fractures, scapular neck fractures [German]. Helv Chir Acta. 1974; 41:225-232.
29. Ruedi T. Fractures of the scapula and clavicle. In: Chapman MW, ed. Operative Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott; 1988: 397-404.
30. Tscherne H, Christ M. Conservative and surgical therapy of shoulder blade fractures [German]. Hefte Unfallheilkd. 1975; 125:52-59.
31. Edwards SG, Whittle AP, Wood GW II. Nonoperative treatment of ipsilateral fractures of the clavicle and scapula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82:774-780.
32. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long W. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974; 14:187-196.
33. Goss TP. Double disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensatory complex. J Orthop Trauma. 1993; 7:99-106.
34. Rowe CR. Evaluation of the shoulder. In: The Shoulder. Newy York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 1988:631-637.
35. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop. 1987; 214:160-164.
36. Rikli D, Regazzoni P, Renner N. The unstable shoulder girdle: early functional treatment utilizing open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 1995; 9:93-97.
37. Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, Snapp D, Swiontkowski MF. Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: The Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment instrument. J Orthop Res. 1996; 14:173-181.
38. Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkowskin MF. Comparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79:1323-1335.
39. Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81:1245-1260.
40. Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care. 1976; 14:57-67.
41. Swiontkowski MF. The outcomes movement in orthopaedic surgery: where we are and where we should go, II: selection of instruments. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81:732-733.