Classification of specimens in the Geonoma stricta (Palmae) complex: The problem of leaf size and shape

Brittonia

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 202-212

  Henderson, Andrew ^a   Martins, Renata ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATIC BOTANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Arecaceae; Classification; Cluster analysis; Geonoma stricta; Hybrids; Ordination; Palmae

Indexed keywords

ARECACEAE; GEONOMA; GEONOMA STRICTA;

EID: 0036663459     PISSN: 0007196X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1663/0007-196X(2002)054[0202:COSITG]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Borchsenius, F. 1999. Morphological variation in Geonoma cuneata in western Ecuador. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 131-139.
2. Burret, M. 1930. Geonomeae americanae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 63: 123-270.
3. Chandler, G. & M. Crisp. 1998. Morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of the Daviesia ulicifolia complex (Fabaceae, Mirbelieae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 209: 93-122.
4. Crisp, M. & P. Weston. 1993. Geographic and ontogenetic variation in morphology of Australian waratahs (Telopea: Proteaceae). Syst. Biol. 42: 49-76.
5. Fritsch, P. & S. Lucas. 2000. Clinal variation in the Halesia carolina complex (Styracaceae). Syst. Bot. 25: 197-210.
6. Galeano, G. 1991. Las Palmas de la Región de Araracuara. Tropenbos, Colombia.
7. Henderson, A. 1995. The Palms of the Amazon. Oxford University Press, New York.
8. _, G. Galeano & R. Bernal. 1995. Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
9. Levin, G. 1999. Evolution in the Acalypha gracilens/monococca complex (Euphorbiaceae): Morphological analysis. Syst. Bot. 23: 269-287.
10. Loo, A., H. Tan, P. Kumar & L. Saw. 2001. Intra-specific variation in Licuala glabra Griff. (Palmae) in Peninsula Malaysia - A morphometric analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72: 115-128.
11. Naczi, R., A. Reznicek & B. Ford. 1998. Morphological differentiation in the Carex willdenowii complex (Cyperaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85: 434-447.
12. Negrón-Ortiz, V. & J. Hickey. 1996. The genus Ernodea (Rubiaceae) in the Atlantic basin. II. Morphological analyses and systematics. Syst. Bot. 21: 445-458.
13. Pimentel, R. 1979. Morphometrics: The Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, USA.
14. Rogstad, S. 1989. The biosystematics and evolution of the Polyalthia hypoleuca complex (Annonaceae) of Malesia, I. Systematic treatment. J. Arnold Arbor. 70: 153-246.
15. Rohlf, F. 2000. NTSYS. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.1. Exeter Software, New York.
16. Sneath, P. & R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
17. Spooner, D., R. Van Den Berg & J. Miller. 2001. Species and series boundaries of Solanum series Longipedicellata (Solanaceae) and phenetically similar species in ser. Demissa and ser. Tuberosa: Implications for a practical taxonomy of section Petota. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 113-130.
18. Thompson, S. & T. Lammers. 1997. Phenetic analysis of morphological variation in the Lobelia cardinalis complex (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae). Syst. Bot. 22: 315-331.
19. Vásquez Martínez, R., Rudas Lleras, A. & C. M. Taylor. 1997. Florula de las Reservas Biológicas de Iquitos, Perú: Allpahuayo-Mishana, Explornapo Camp, Explorama Lodge. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri.
20. Wessels Boer, J. 1968. The geonomoid palms. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Tweede Sect. Ser 2, 58: 1-202.
21. Wilkinson, L. 1997. Systat Statistics Version 7.0 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
22. Wilson, P. 1992. On inferring hybridity from morphological intermediacy. Taxon 41: 11-23.