A comparison of the OnTrak Testcup-5 to laboratory urinalysis among arrestees

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 325-329

  Yacoubian, George S ^a   Wish, Eric D ^b   Choyka, Jill D ^b  

^a McFarland Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Arrestees; Instant urine tests; Rapid drug screen; SANTA

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE DERIVATIVE; CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; ILLICIT DRUG; PHENCYCLIDINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG SCREENING; ENZYME MULTIPLIED IMMUNOASSAY TECHNIQUE; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OFFENDER; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES; URINALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FORENSIC MEDICINE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; HUMANS; IMMUNOASSAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRISONERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; URINALYSIS;

EID: 0036660967     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2002.10399971     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Dembo, R.; Williams, L.; Wish, E.D. & Schmeidler, J. 1990. Urine Testing of Detained Juveniles to Identify High Risk Youth. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
2. De la Torre, R.; Domingo-Salvany, A.; Badia, R.; Gonzalez, G.; McFarlane, D.; San, L. & Torrens, M. 1996. Clinical evaluation of the Triage™ analytical device for drugs-of-abuse testing. Clinical Chemistry 42: 1433-38.
3. Gray, T. & Wish, E.D. 1998. Substance Abuse and Need for Treatment Among Arrestees (SANTA) in Maryland. College Park, Maryland: Center for Substance Abuse Research.
4. Harrison, L. 1995. The validity of self-reported data on drug use. Journal of Drug Issues 25: 91-111.
5. Lilienfield, D.E.; Stolley, P.D. & Lilienfield, A.M. 1994. Foundations of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Magura, S. & Kang, S. 1996. Validity of self-reported drug use in high-risk populations: A meta-analytical review. Substance Abuse and Misuse 31: 1131-53.
7. Manno, J.E. 1986. Interpretation of urinalysis results. In: R.L. Hawks & C.N. Chiang (Eds.) Urine Testing for Drugs of Abuse. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
8. Mieczkowski, T. 1999. Drug Testing Technology. New York: CRC Press.
9. Mieczkowski, T. 1990. The accuracy of self-reported drug use. In. R. Weisheit (Ed.) Drugs, Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson Publishing Company.
10. Mieczkowski, T.; Newel, R.; & Wraight, B. 1998. Using hair analysis, urinalysis and self-reports to estimate drug use in a sample of detained juveniles. Substance Use and Misuse 33: 1547-67.
11. Mieczkowski, T.; Barzelay, D.; Gropper, B. & Wish, E.D. 1991. Concordance of three measures of cocaine use in an arrestee population: Hair, urine, and self-report. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 23: 241-46.
12. National Institute of Justice (NIJ). 2000. 1999 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice.
13. Peace, M.R.; Tarnai, L.D. & Poklis, A. 2000. Performance evaluation of four on-site drug-testing devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 24: 589-94.
14. Roche Diagnostics. 2000. Drug Abuse Testing Resource and Training Guide. Indianapolis, Indiana: Roche Diagnostics.
15. Wish, E.D.; Hoffman, J.A. & Nemes, S. 1997. The validity of self-reports of drug use at treatment admission and at follow-up: Comparisons with urinalysis and hair assays. In: L. Harrison & A. Hughes (Eds.) The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
16. Wish, E.D.; Yacoubian, G.; Pérez, D.M.; & Choyka, J.D. 2000. Test first and ask questions afterwards: Improving the validity of self-report drug use data by arrestees. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Society of Criminology (ASC), San Francisco, California.
17. Yacoubian, G.; Wish, E.D.; & Pérez, D.M. 2001. A comparison of saliva testing to urinalysis in an arrestee population. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 33 (3): 289-94.
18. Yacoubian, G. 2000. Reassessing the need for urinalysis as a validation technique. Journal of Drug Issues 30 (2): 323-34.