How responsible are people for their employment situation? An application of the triangle model of responsibility

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 201-209

  Wohl, Michael J A ^a   Pritchard, Evan T ^a   Kelly, Barry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036658292     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087172     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Almon, C. (1979). A system of consumption functions and its estimation for Belgium. Southern Economic Journal, 46, 85-106.
2. Britt, T.W. (1999). Engaging the self in the field: Testing the triangle model of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 696-706.
3. Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
4. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (1997). Help wanted: Economic security for youth. Retrieved October 21, 2001, from http://www.policyalternatives.ca.
5. Canadian Federation of Students (1997, May). Youth unemployment (Issue Brief Vol. 4, No. 6). Ottawa, ON: Author.
6. Church, G.J. (1993). Jobs in an age of insecurity. Time, 142, 32-40.
7. Dickey, W.J. (1998). Forgiveness and crime: The possibilities of restorative justice. In R. Enright & J. North (Eds.), Exploring forgiveness. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
8. Fincham, F.D., & Jasper, J.M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Foot, D.K., & Stoffman, D. (1996). Boom, bust and echo: How to profit from the coming demographic shift. Toronto, ON: Mcfarlane Walter & Ross.
10. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D.T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
11. Kouabenan, D.R., Gilibert, D., Medina, M., & Bouzon, F. (2001). Heirarchical position, gender, accident severity, and causal attribution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 553-575.
12. Lerner, M.J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
13. Lerner, M.J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental decision. New York: Plenum.
14. Neff, W.S. (1985). Work and human behavior. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Co.
15. Robinson, D. (2001). State of the economy. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 1, 1-9.
16. Rousseau, D.M., & Wade-Benzoni, K.A. (1995). Changing individual-organizational attachments. In A. Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
17. Schlenker, B.R. (1997). Personal responsibility: Applications of the triangle model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 241-301.
18. Schlenker, B.R., Britt, T.W., Pennington, J.W., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K.J. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632-652.
19. Schmidt, S.R., & Svorny, S.V. (1998). Recent trends in job security and stability. Journal of Labour Research, 19, 647-669.
20. Schor, J.B. (1992). The over worked American. New York: Basic Books.
21. Schrammel, K. (1998). Comparing the labor market success of young adults from two generations. Monthly Labor Review, 121, 3-10.
22. Shore, L.M., & Tetrick, L.E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. In C.L. Cooper & D.M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior, Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
23. Statistics Canada (2001). Labour force survey. Retrieved October 21, 2001, from http://www.statcan.ca.
24. Stérn, E. (1993). The transformation of work-related development in a rapidly changing world: Exploring how to learn from each other. Journal of Career Development, 20, 91-97.
25. Summers, G., & Feldmam, N. S. (1984). Blaming the victim versus blaming the perpetrator: An attributional analysis of spouse abuse. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 339-347.
26. Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73-79.