Effect of deep inhalations after a bronchial methacholine provocation in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects

Respiratory Medicine

Volumn 96, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 477-481

  Sundblad, B M ^a   Larsson, K ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Asthma; Deep inhalation; Healthy subjects; Methacholine provocation

Indexed keywords

METHACHOLINE;

ADULT; AIRWAY CONSTRICTION; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; BRONCHOSPASM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; HUMAN; INHALATION TEST; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST;

EID: 0036657437     PISSN: 09546111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1339     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Scichilone N, Kapsali T, Permutt S, Togias A. Deep insiration-induced brochoprotection is stronger than bronchodilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 910-916.
2. 1 measurements in a methacholine provocation test. Eur Respir J 993; 6: 680-686.
3. Skloot G, Permutt S, Togias A. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: a problem of limited smooth muscle relaxation with inspiration. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 2393-2403.
4. Moore B, Verburgt L, King G, Paré P. The effect of deep inspiration on methacholine dose-response curves in normal subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 1278-1281.
5. Kapsali T, Permutt S, Laube B, Scichilone N, Togias A. Potent bronchoprotective effect of deep inspiration and its absence in asthma. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 711-720.
6. Burns C, Taylor W, Ingram R, Jr. Effects of deep inhalation in asthma: relative airway and parenchymal hysteresis. J Appl Physiol 1985; 59: 1590-1596.
7. Malmberg P, Larsson K, Thunberg S. Increased lung deposition and biological effect of methacholine by use of drying device for bronchial provocation tests. Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 890-898.
8. Sundblad B-M, Malmberg P, Larsson K. Different response to doubling and fourfold dose increases in methacholine provocation tests in healthy subjects. Chest 2000; 118: 1371-1377.
9. ATS. Standardization of spirometry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 152: 1107-1136.
10. Eklund L, Sundblad B-M, Malmberg P, Larsson K. The salt output of a nebulizer - a comparison between two nebulizer types. Resp Med 2000; 94: 139-144.
11. 1 as measures of airway responsiveness to methacholine. Clin Physiol 2001; 21: 673-681.
12. Chinn S. Methodology of bronchial responsiveness. Thorax 1998; 53: 984-988.
13. Seppälä O. The dose-response slope: a useful method for expressing the results of methacholine provocation tests in healthy subjects? Respir Med 1991; 85: 365-371.
14. Lundbäck B, Nyström L, Rosenhall L, Stjernberg N. Obstructive lung disease in northern Sweden: respiratory symptoms assessed in a postal survey. Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 257-266.
15. Scichilone N, Permutt S, Togias A. The lack of the bronchoprotective and not the bronchodilatory ability of deep inspiration is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 413-419.
16. Duggan C, Chan J, Whelan A, Berend N. Bronchodilatation induced by deep breaths in relation to transpulmonary pressure and lung volume. Thorax 1990; 45: 930-934.
17. Brusasco V, Crimi E, Barisione G, Spanevello A, Rodarte J, Pellegrino R. Airway responsiveness to methacholine: effects of deep inhalations and airway inflammation. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 567-573.
18. Jensen A, Atileh H, Suki B, Ingenito E, Lutchen K. Signal transduction in smooth muscle. Selected contribution: Airway caliber in healthy and asthmatic subjects: effects of bronchial challenge and deep inspirations. J Appl Physiol 2001; 91: 506-515.
19. Woolcock A, Salome M, Yan K. The shape of the dose-response curve to histamine in asthmatic and normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130: 71-75.
20. Sterk P, Fabbri L, Quanjer P, Cockcroft D, ÓByrne P, Anderson S, et al. Airway responsiveness. Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. Eur Respir J 1993; 6 (Suppl 16): 53-83.