Selection of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with duplex scanning

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 391-395

  Boström Ardin, Annika ^a   Lofberg A M ^a   Hellberg, A ^a   Andren B ^a   Ljungman, C ^a   Logason, K ^a   Karacagil, S ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Arteries, ultrasonography; Duplex scanning; Peripheral vascular disease, angioplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEG; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULARIZATION;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEG; MALE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 0036656923     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2002.430409.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ASCHER E., MAZZARIOL F., HINGORANI A., SALLES-CUNHA S. & GADE P.: The use of duplex ultrasound arterial mapping as an alternative to conventional arteriography for primary and secondary infrapopliteal bypasses. Am. J. Surg. 178 (1999), 162.
2. BODILY K., BUTTORFF J., NORDESGAARD A. & OSBORNE R. JR: Aorto-iliac reconstruction without angiography. Am. J. Surg. 171 (1996), 505.
3. BOLIA A.: Percutaenous intentional extraluminal (sub-intimal) recanalisation of crural arteries. Eur. J. Radiol. 28 (1998), 199.
4. EDWARDS J. M., COLDWELL D. M., GOLDMAN M. L. & STRANDNESS D. E JR: The role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for transluminal angioplasty. J. Vasc. Surg. 13 (1991), 69.
5. ELSMAN B. H., LEGEMATE D. A., VAN DER HEYDEN F. W., DE Vos H., MALI W. P. & EIKELBOOM B. C.: The use of color-coded duplex scanning in the selection of patients with lower extremity arterial disease for percutaenous transluminal angioplasty. A prospective study. Cardivasc. Intervent. Radiol. 19 (1996), 313.
6. HUNINK M. G. M., WONG J. B., DONALDSON M. C. et al.: Revascularization for femoropopliteal disease: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 274 (1995), 165.
7. KARACAGIL S., LÖFBERG A.-M., ALMGREN B. et al.: Duplex ultrasound scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal arterial disease. Vasa 23 (1994), 325.
8. KARACAGIL S., LÖFBERG A.-M., GRANBO A., LÖRELIUS L.-E. & BERGQVIST D: Value of duplex scanning in evaluation of crural and foot arteries in limbs with severe lower limb ischaemia - a prospective comparison with angiography. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 12 (1996), 300.
9. LEGEMATE D. A., TEEUWEN G., HOENEVELD H. & EIKELBOOM B. C.: Value of duplex scanning compared with angiography and pressure measurements in the assessment of aortoiliac lesions. Br. J. Surg. 78 (1991), 1003.
10. LEVY M. M., BAUM R. A. & CARPENTER J. P.: Endovascular surgery solely based on noninvasive preprocedural im-aging. J. Vasc. Surg. 28 (1998), 995.
11. MARTIN E. C.: The impact of angioplasty. A perspective. JVIR 3 (1992), 511.
12. MONETA G. L., YEAGER R. A., ANTONOVIC R. et al.: Accuracy of lower extremity arterial duplex mapping. J. Vasc. Surg. 15 (1992), 275.
13. PENTECOST M. J., CRIQUI M. H., DORROS G. et al.: Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. Circulation 89 (1994), 511.
14. SARKAR R., RO K. M., OBRAND D. I. & AHN S. S.: Lower extremity vascular reconstruction and endovascular surgery without preoperative angiography. Am. J. Surg. 176 (1998), 203.
15. SCHNEIDER P. A., OGAWA D. Y. & RUSH M. P.: Lower extremity revascularization without contrast arteriography. A prospective study of operation based upon duplex mapping. Cardiovasc. Surg. 7 (1999), 699.
16. VAN DER ZAAG E. S., LEGEMATE D. A., NGUYEN T., BALM R. & JACOBS M. J.: Aortoiliac reconstructive surgery based upon the results of duplex scanning. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 16 (1998), 383.