Fragrance testing in the 21st century

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 60-61

  Larsen, W G ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRAGRANCE;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FLAVOR; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; PATIENT COUNSELING; PUBLIC HEALTH; RELIABILITY; STANDARD; TASTE ACUITY;

ALLERGENS; BALSAMS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 0036656762     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470121.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Larsen W G. Perfume dermatitis. J Am Dermatol 1985: 12: 1-9.
2. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menné T, Rastogi S C. Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 1999: 141: 1076-1083.
3. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T et al. A study of new fragrance mixtures. Am J Contact Derm 1998: 9: 202-206.
4. Maouad M, Fleisher A B, Sherertz E F, Feldman S R. Significance - prevalence index number: a re-interpretation and enhancement of data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999: 41: 5737-5736.
5. Salam T N, Fowler J F Jr. Balsam-related systemic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001: 45: 377-381.