Caries development in a young population managed by a restrictive attitude to radiography and operative intervention: II. A study at the surface level

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 232-239

  Lith, A ^a   Lindstrand, C ^b   Grondahl H G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Department of Orthodontics ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dental caries; Guidelines; Incidence; Radiography, dental

Indexed keywords

FLUORIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CALCULATION; CHILD; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SURVIVAL TIME; TOOTH FILLING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENTAL SURGERY; DISEASE COURSE; ENAMEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SURVEY; INCIDENCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PREVALENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; SWEDEN; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BICUSPID; CHILD; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DMF INDEX; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MOLAR; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SWEDEN;

EID: 0036653957     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600705     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Silverstone LM. Remineralization phenomena. Caries Res 1977; 11(Suppl 1): 59-84.
2. Backer Dirks O. Posterruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent Res 1966;45:503-511.
3. Thylstrup A, Bruun C, Holmen L. In vivo caries models-mechanisms for caries initiation and arrestment. Adv Dent Res 1994; 8: 144-157.
4. Anderson MH, Bales DJ, Omnell KA. Modern management of dental caries: the cutting edge is not the dental bur. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 36-44.
5. Anusavice KJ. Treatment regimens in preventive and restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 727-743.
6. Bille J, Thylstrup A. Radiographic diagnosis and clinical tissue changes in relation to treatment of approximal carious lesions. Caries Res 1982; 16: 1-6.
7. Pitts NB, Rimmer PA. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth. Caries Res 1992; 26: 146-152.
8. Lunder N, von der Fehr FR. Approximal cavitation related to bite-wing image and caries activity in adolescents. Caries Res 1996; 30: 143-147.
9. Sawle RF, Andlaw RJ. Has occlusal caries become more difficult to diagnose? A study comparing clinically undetected lesions in molar teeth of 14-16-year old children in 1974 and 1982 [published erratum appears in Br Dent J 1988 Jun 11:164(11):361]. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 209-211.
10. Sawle RF, Andlaw RJ. Has occlusal caries become more difficult to diagnose? A study comparing clinically undetected lesions in molar teeth of 14-16-year old children in 1974 and 1982 [published erratum appears in Br Dent J 1988 Jun 11:164(11):361]. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 209-211.
11. Creanor SL, Russell JI, Strang DM, Stephen KW, Burchell CK. The prevalence of clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries in Scottish adolescents [see comments]. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 126-129.
12. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ, Bast AJ, Kieft JA, Eijkman MA, van Amerongen WE. Clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries: a radiographic comparison. Caries Res 1992; 26: 305-309.
13. Richardson PS, McIntyre IG. The difference between clinical and bitewing detection of approximal and occlusal caries in Royal Air Force recruits. Community Dent Health 1996; 13: 65-69.
14. Mejàre I, Gröndahl H-G, Carlstedt K, Grever AC, Ottosson E. Accuracy at radiography and probing for the diagnosis of proximal caries. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 178-184.
15. Douglass CW, Valachovic RW, Wijesinha A, Chauncey HH, Kapur KK, McNeil BJ. Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 330-339.
16. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Mikkelsen L, Mouyen F. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72: 621-626.
17. Espelid I, Tveit AB, Fjelltveit A. Variations among dentists in radiographic detection of occlusal caries. Caries Res 1994; 28: 169-175.
18. Hintze H, Wenzel A. Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 115-118.
19. Gröndahl H-G. Radiographic caries diagnosis and treatment decisions. Swed Dent J 1979; 3: 109-117.
20. Tulloch JF, Antczak-Bouckoms AA, Berkey CS, Douglass CW. Selecting the optimal threshold for the radiographic diagnosis of interproximal caries. J Dent Educ 1988; 52: 630-636.
21. Gröndahl H-G. Radiographic assement of caries and caries progression. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Criteria for placement and replacement. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1989, pp 151-167.
22. Shwartz M, Gröndahl H-G, Pliskin JS, Boffa J. A longitudinal analysis from bite-wing radiographs of the rate of progression of approximal carious lesions through human dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1984; 29: 529-536.
23. Bille J, Carstens K. Approximal caries progression in 13- to 15-year-old Danish children. Acta Odontol Scand 1989; 47: 347-354.
24. Kolehmainen L, Rytömaa I. Increment of dental caries among Finnish dental students during a period of 2 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1977; 5: 140-144.
25. Mejàre I, Källestål C, Stenlund H. Incidence and progression of approximal caries from 11 to 22 years of age in Sweden: A prospective radiographic study. Caries Res 1999; 33: 93-100.
26. Shwartz M, Pliskin JS, Gröndahl H-G, Boffa J. The expected benefits from alternative frequencies of bitewing radiograms. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44: 11-16.
27. Moles DR, Downer MC. Optimum bitewing examination recall intervals assessed by computer simulation. Community Dent Health 2000; 17: 14-19.
28. Lith A, Lindstrand C, Gröndahl H-G. Caries Development in a Young Population Managed by a Restrictive Attitude to Radiography and Operative Intervention. I. A Study at the Patient Level. DentoMaxillofac Radial 2002; in press.
29. Shwartz M, Pliskin JS, Gr̈ndahl H-G, Boffa J. The frequency of bitewing radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61: 300-305.
30. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Ass 1958; 53: P. 457-481.
31. McDonagh MS, Whiting PF, Wilson PM, Sutton AJ, Chestnutt I, Cooper J et al. Systematic review of water fluoridation. BMJ 2000; 321: 855-859.
32. Treasure ET, Dever JG. Relationship of caries with socioeconomic status in 14-year-old children from communities with different fluoride histories. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22: 226-230.
33. Mejàre I, Källestal C, Stenlund H, Johansson H. Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Caries Res 1998; 32: 10-16.
34. Mejàre I, Sundberg H, Espelid I, Tveit B. Caries assessment and restorative treatment thresholds reported by Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57: 149-154.
35. Tveit AB, Espelid I, Skodje F. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway. Int Dent J 1999; 49: 165-172.
36. Espelid I, Tveit A, Haugejorden O, Riordan PJ. Variation in radiographie interpretation and restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries among dentists in Norway. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985; 13: 26-29.
37. Riordan PJ, Espelid I, Tveit AB, Radiographic interpretation and treatment decisions among dental therapists and dentists in Western Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991; 19: 268-271.
38. Swan ES, Lewis DW. Ontario dentists: 2. Bitewing utilization and restorative treatment decisions. J Can Dent Assoc 1993; 59: 68-70, 73-65.
39. Heidmann J, Høund U, Poulsen S. Changing criteria for restorative treatment of approximal caries over a 10-year period. Caries Res 1987; 21: 460-463.
40. Edward S. Changes in caries diagnostic criteria over time related to the insertion of fillings. A comparative study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 23-26.
41. Mileman PA, Espelid I. Decisions on restorative treatment and recall intervals based on bitewing radiographs. A comparison between national surveys of Dutch and Norwegian practitioners. Community Dent Health 1988; 5: 273-284.
42. Jensen OE, Handelman SL, Iker HP. Use and quality of bitewing films in private dental offices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 63: 249-253.
43. Gröndahl H-G, Lith A, Jönsson G, Persson Y. Approximal caries and frequency of bitewing examinations in Swedish children and adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992; 20: 20-24.
44. Edblad E, Gustafsson A, Svenson B, Jansson L. Number and frequency of bitewing radiographs and assessment of approximal caries in 14-to-19-year-old Swedish adolescents. Swed Dent J 1998; 22: 157-164.
45. Matteson SR, Joseph LP, Bottomley W, Finger HW, Frommer HH, Koch RW et al. The report of the panel to develop radiographic selection criteria for dental patients. Gen Dent 1991; 39: 264-270.
46. Pitts NB, Kidd EA. The prescription and timing of bitewing radiography in the diagnosis and management of dental caries: contemporary recommendations [see comments]. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 225-227.
47. Cale AE, Kaugars GE. Reduction in bitewing radiographs for patients with no clinical signs of dental caries. Gen Dent 1987; 35: 292-294.
48. Berkey CS, Douglass CW, Valachovic RW, Chauncey HH. Longitudinal radiographic analysis of carious lesion progression. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988; 16: 83-90.
49. Lervik T, Haugejorden O, Aas C. Progression of posterior approximal carious lesions in Norwegian teenagers from 1982 to 1986. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 223-227.
50. Arnold LV. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part I. The influence of exposure conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64: 221-231.
51. van der Stelt PF, Ruttiman UE, Webber RL, Heemstra P. In vitro study into the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the detection of artificial caries defects on bitewing radiographs. Caries Res 1989; 23: 334-341.
52. EH I, Weiss EI, Tzohar A, Littner MM, Gelernter I, Kaffe I. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 1. Evaluation of the presence of approximal lesions. J Dent 1996; 24: 379-383.
53. Shwartz M, Pliskin JS, Gröndahl H-G, Boffa J. Use of the Kaplan-Meier estimate to reduce biases in estimating the rate of caries progression. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1984; 12: 103-108.
54. Chestnutt IG, Schafer F, Jacobson AP, Stephen KW. Incremental susceptibility of individual tooth surfaces to dental caries in Scottish adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 11-16.
55. Lith A, Pettersson LG, Gröndahl H-G. Radiographic study of approximal restorative treatment in children and adolescents in two Swedish communities differing in caries prevalence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995; 23: 211-216.