|
Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 635-641
|
Comparison between a conventional technique and two bone regeneration techniques in periradicular surgery
|
Author keywords
Guided bone regeneration; Membranes; Periradicular surgery; Synthetic bone substitutes
|
Indexed keywords
HYDROXYAPATITE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE;
BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT;
BONE PROSTHESIS;
BONE REGENERATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
ORAL SURGERY;
OSTEOLYSIS;
PERIODONTICS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS;
BONE REGENERATION;
BONE SUBSTITUTES;
DURAPATITE;
FEMALE;
GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, PERIODONTAL;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL;
MIDDLE AGED;
ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
|
EID: 0036653003
PISSN: 01432885
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00523.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (58)
|
References (15)
|