Influence of Particle Size of Autogenous Bone Grafts on the Early Stages of Bone Regeneration: A Histologic and Stereologic Study in Rabbit Calvarium

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 498-506

  Pallesen, Lars ^e   Schou, Søren ^a,d   Aaboe, Merete ^b   Hjørting Hansen, Erik ^e   Nattestad, Anders ^a   Melsen, Flemming ^c  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^b GLOSTRUP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Autogenous bone grafts; Bone regeneration; Calvarial defects; Histology; Particle size; Particulated bone grafts; Rabbits; Revascularization; Stereology

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRONTAL BONE; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARTICLE SIZE; RABBIT; RANDOMIZATION; SKULL; TISSUE REGENERATION; VASCULARIZATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FRONTAL BONE; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; PARIETAL BONE; PARTICLE SIZE; RABBITS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0036631795     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Buser D, Dula K, Hess D, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. Periodontology 2000 1999;19:151-163.
2. Nyström E, Lundgren S, Gunne J, Nilson H. Interpositional bone grafting and Le Fort I osteotomy for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla. A two-stage technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:423-427.
3. Nyström E, Kahnberg KE, Gunne J. Bone grafts and Brånemark implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla. A 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:45-53.
4. Enemark H, Jensen J, Bosch C. Mandibular bone graft material for reconstruction of alveolar cleft defects: Long term results. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:155-163.
5. Boyne PJ. Osseous Reconstruction of the Maxilla and the Mandible. Surgical Techniques using Titanium Mesh and Bone Mineral. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1997.
6. Carlson ER, Marx RE. Mandibular reconstruction using cancellous cellular bone grafts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54:889-897.
7. Shirota T, Ohno K, Motohashi M, Michi K-I. Histologic and microradiologic comparison of block and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts in reconstructed mandibles being considered for dental implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:15-20.
8. Hjørting-Hansen E, Harder F, Gotfredsen K, Schou S. Aspects of osseous regeneration in relation to implants. Proceedings from the XV Congresso Nazionale ANIO, Abano Terme, Italy. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi, 1994;169-178.
9. Isaksson S, Alberius P, Klinge B, Jönsson J. Contribution of autogeneic membranous bone chips and bone paste to healing of rabbit skull defects. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100: 274-278.
10. Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Schou S, Hjørting-Hansen E. Incomplete bone regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using different membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9: 313-320.
11. Buijs R, Dogterom AA. An improved method for embedding hard tissue in polymethyl methacrylate. Stain Technol 1983; 58:135-141.
12. Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Schou S, Hjørting-Hansen E. Unbiased stereological methods used for the quantitative evaluation of guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:163-169.
13. Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 1987; 147:229-263.
14. Baddeley AJ, Gundersen HJG, Cruz-Orive LM. Estimation of surface area from vertical sections. J Microsc 1986;142: 259-276.
15. Kiernan JA. Methods for connective tissue. In: Kiernan JA. Histological & Histochemical Methods. Theory and Practice. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1950:115-130.
16. Gundersen HJG, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, et al. Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1988;96:379-394.
17. Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop 1986;205:299-308.
18. Lundgren AK, Lundgren D, Sennerby L, Taylor Å, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Augmentation of skull bone using a bioresorbable barrier supported by autologous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:90-95.
19. Hämmerle CHF, Schmid J, Lang NP, Olah AJ. Temporal dynamics of healing in rabbit cranial defects using guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:167-174.
20. Fonseca RJ, Clark PJ, Burkes EJ, Baker RD. Revascularization and healing of onlay particulate autologous bone grafts in primates. J Oral Surg 1980;38:572-577.
21. Phillips JH, Rahn BA. Fixation effects on membranous and endochondral onlay bone graft. Revascularization and bone deposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:891-897.
22. Chen NT, Glowacki J, Bucky LP, Hong H-Z, Kim W-K, Yaremchuk MJ. The roles of revascularization and resorption on endurance of craniofacial onlay bone grafts in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:714-722.
23. Schlingemann RO, Dingjan GM, Emeis JJ, Blok J, Warnaar SO, Ruiter DJ. Monoclonal antibody PAL-E specific for endothelium. Lab Invest 1985;52:71-76.
24. v on thick sections. J Micros 1979;117:333-345.
25. Schiller AL. Bones and joints. In: Rubin E, Farber JL (eds). Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:1273-1346.
26. Einhorn TA. Current concepts review. Enhancement of fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77:940-956.
27. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop 1983;174:28-42.
28. Marx RE, Miller RI, Ehler WJ, Hubbard G, Malinin TI. A comparison of particulate allogeneic and particulate autogenous bone grafts into maxillary alveolar clefts in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:3-9.
29. Dado DV, Izquierdo R. Absorption of onlay bone grafts in immature rabbits: Membranous versus enchondral bone and bone struts versus paste. Ann Plast Surg 1989;23:39-48.
30. Gundersen HJG, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, et al. The new stereological tools: Dissector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1988;96:857-881.